How I treat multiple myeloma in younger patients
Abstract
Therapeutic options for multiple myeloma (MM) patients have changed quickly in recent years and uncertainty has arisen about optimal approaches to therapy. A reasonable goal of MM treatment in younger “transplant eligible” patients is to initiate therapy with a target goal of durable complete remission, and the anticipated consequence of long-term disease control. To achieve this goal we recommend induction therapy with multi-agent combination chemotherapies (usually selected from bortezomib, lenalidomide, thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and corticosteriods) which when employed together elicit frequent, rapid, and deep responses. We recommend consolidation with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation in the majority of patients willing and able to undergo this procedure and subsequent maintenance therapy, especially in those failing to achieve a complete response or at high risk for early relapse based on prognostic, genetically defined risk factors. Defining genetic risk for early relapse is therefore an important aspect of early diagnostic testing and attention to minimizing expected toxicities once therapy begins is critical in ensuring the efficacy of modern combination therapy approaches. When access to newer drugs is restricted participation in clinical trials should be pursued.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Proteasome inhibitors antagonize lenalidomide-induced protein degradation.
“given that proteasome inhibitors antagonize lenalidomide-induced protein degradation11,12,55.”
From Cancer therapies based on targeted protein degradation — lessons learned with lenalidomide (2021) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 83 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- Stewart, A. K., Richardson, P. G., & San-Miguel, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- University Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
- ORCID
- Richardson, Paul G.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2009-12-24
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 5436-5443
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2033024649
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Blood (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
- Keywords
- multiple myeloma, transplant-eligible patients, induction chemotherapy, bortezomib, lenalidomide, thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, high-dose melphalan, autologous stem cell transplantation, maintenance therapy, complete remission, genetic risk factors, treatment toxicity
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Prognosis, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Transplantation, Autologous, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Cytogenetic Analysis, Stem Cell Transplantation, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review