The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of human cord blood engraftment between immunocompromised mouse strains
Open accessAbstract
The nonobese diabetic/severe combined immune deficiency (NOD-scid) xenotransplantation model is the “gold standard” for assaying human hematopoietic stem cell activity. Systematic advancements, such as depletion of natural killer cell activity with anti-CD122 antibody, direct intrafemoral injection, and deletion or truncation of IL2Rγ, have improved human cell engraftment; however, questions remain whether these mouse models are equivalent or, if not, which model is superior for assaying hematopoietic stem cell activity. To address this, we compared overall engraftment and multilineage differentiation of near-limiting doses of lineage-depleted human umbilical cord blood cells by direct intrafemoral injection into NOD/Lt-scid, NOD/Shi-scid, NOD/Lt-scid/IL2Rγnull (NSG), and NOD/Shi-scid/IL2Rγnull mice. Transplantation into NSG mice generated moderately higher human engraftment levels in bone marrow compared with other strains. At limiting doses, NSG mice of both sexes were 3.6-fold more sensitive in detecting SCID-repopulating cells compared with NOD/Lt-scid mice. However, NSG females exhibited higher engraftment at limiting cell doses, resulting in an overall increase in SCID-repopulating cell detection of 9-fold. Both NSG and NOD/Shi-scid/IL2Rγnull support significantly improved engraftment in peripheral tissues compared with NOD/Lt-scid and NOD/Shi-scid mice, whereas NSG mice provide greater human engraftment in bone marrow than all other strains, especially at limiting doses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lentiviral Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy Benefits Metachromatic Leukodystrophy
Biffi, A., Montini, E., Lorioli, L., Cesani, M., Fumagalli, F., Plati, T., Baldoli, C., Martino, S., Calabria, A., Canale, S., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1233158 · Cited by 1,180
Ex vivo gene transfer and correction for cell-based therapies
Naldini, L. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2985 · Cited by 358
Highly Efficient Genome Editing of Murine and Human Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells by CRISPR/Cas9
Gundry, M. C., Brunetti, L., Lin, A., Mayle, A. E., Kitano, A., Wagner, D., Hsu, J. I., Hoegenauer, K. A., Rooney, C. M., Goodell, M. A., et al. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.092 · Cited by 265
“As expected for this time point (Goyama et al., 2015; McDermott et al., 2010), engrafted human HSPCs gave rise mainly to B- and myeloid cells in the bone marrow in both Cas9 only and Cas9/hCD45-sg1 RNP engrafted mice, with no differences between Gundry et al.”
BackgroundAttenuation of miR-126 Activity Expands HSC In Vivo without Exhaustion
Lechman, E. R., Gentner, B., van Galen, P., Giustacchini, A., Saini, M., Boccalatte, F. E., Hiramatsu, H., Restuccia, U., Bachi, A., Voisin, V., et al. (2012) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.09.001 · Cited by 208
Self-citationGene correction for SCID-X1 in long-term hematopoietic stem cells
Pavel-Dinu, M., Wiebking, V., Dejene, B. T., Srifa, W., Mantri, S., Nicolas, C. E., Lee, C., Bao, G., Kildebeck, E. J., Punjya, N., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09614-y · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- McDermott, S. P., Eppert, K., Lechman, E. R., Doedens, M., & Dick, J. E.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2010-07-15
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-200
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2033548186
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of human cord blood engraftment between immunocompromised mouse strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2010-02-271841
- The paper
- McDermott, S. P., Eppert, K., Lechman, E. R., Doedens, M., & Dick, J. E. (2010). Comparison of human cord blood engraftment between immunocompromised mouse strains. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-02-271841
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
