Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 690

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative analysis of risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease and for chronic graft-versus-host disease according to National Institutes of Health consensus criteria

Open access
Flowers, Mary E. D., Inamoto, Yoshihiro, Carpenter, Paul A., Lee, Stephanie J., Kiem, Hans-Peter, Petersdorf, Effie W., Pereira, Shalini E., Nash, Richard A., Mielcarek, Marco, Fero, Matthew L., Warren, Edus H., Sanders, Jean E., Storb, Rainer F., Appelbaum, Frederick R., Storer, Barry E., Martin, Paul J.·2011·Blood

Abstract

Risk factors for grades 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and for chronic GVHD as defined by National Institutes of Health consensus criteria were evaluated and compared in 2941 recipients of first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation at our center. In multivariate analyses, the profiles of risk factors for acute and chronic GVHD were similar, with some notable differences. Recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching and the use of unrelated donors had a greater effect on the risk of acute GVHD than on chronic GVHD, whereas the use of female donors for male recipients had a greater effect on the risk of chronic GVHD than on acute GVHD. Total body irradiation was strongly associated with acute GVHD, but had no statistically significant association with chronic GVHD, whereas grafting with mobilized blood cells was strongly associated with chronic GVHD but not with acute GVHD. Older patient age was associated with chronic GVHD, but had no effect on acute GVHD. For all risk factors associated with chronic GVHD, point estimates and confidence intervals were not significantly changed after adjustment for prior acute GVHD. These results suggest that the mechanisms involved in acute and chronic GVHD are not entirely congruent and that chronic GVHD is not simply the end stage of acute GVHD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2010-08-302109

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 690

Metadata

Authors
Flowers, M. E. D., Inamoto, Y., Carpenter, P. A., Lee, S. J., Kiem, H.-P., Petersdorf, E. W., Pereira, S. E., Nash, R. A., Mielcarek, M., Fero, M. L., Warren, E. H., Sanders, J. E., Storb, R. F., Appelbaum, F. R., Storer, B. E., & Martin, P. J.
Venue
Blood
Published
2011-03-17
Volume
117
Issue
11
Pages
3214-3219
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2044560944
Cited by
690
References
0
FWCI
25.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative analysis of risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease and for chronic graft-versus-host disease according to National Institutes of Health consensus criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2010-08-302109
The paper
Flowers, M. E. D., Inamoto, Y., Carpenter, P. A., Lee, S. J., Kiem, H.-P., Petersdorf, E. W., Pereira, S. E., Nash, R. A., Mielcarek, M., Fero, M. L., Warren, E. H., Sanders, J. E., Storb, R. F., Appelbaum, F. R., Storer, B. E., & Martin, P. J. (2011). Comparative analysis of risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease and for chronic graft-versus-host disease according to National Institutes of Health consensus criteria. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-08-302109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.