Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The genetics of Richter syndrome reveals disease heterogeneity and predicts survival after transformation

Open access
Rossi, Davide, Spina, Valeria, Deambrogi, Clara, Rasi, Silvia, Laurenti, Luca, Stamatopoulos, Kostas, Arcaini, Luca, Lucioni, Marco, Rocque, Gabrielle B., Xu-Monette, Zijun Y., Visco, Carlo, Chang, Julie, Chigrinova, Ekaterina, Forconi, Francesco, Marasca, Roberto, Besson, Caroline, Papadaki, Theodora, Paulli, Marco, Larocca, Luigi M., Pileri, Stefano A., Gattei, Valter, Bertoni, Francesco, Foà, Robin, Young, Ken H., Gaidano, Gianluca·2011·Blood

Abstract

Richter syndrome (RS) represents the development of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the context of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The scarcity of biologic information about RS has hampered the identification of molecular predictors of RS outcome. We addressed this issue by performing a comprehensive molecular characterization of 86 pathologically proven RS. TP53 disruption (47.1%) and c-MYC abnormalities (26.2%) were the most frequent alterations, whereas common genetic lesions of de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were rare or absent. By multivariate analysis, lack of TP53 disruption (hazard ratio, 0.43; P = .003) translated into significant survival advantage with 57% reduction in risk of death. An algorithm based on TP53 disruption, response to RS treatment, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status had 80.9% probability of correctly discriminating RS survival (c-index = .809). RS that were clonally unrelated to the paired chronic lymphocytic leukemia phase were clinically and biologically different from clonally related RS because of significantly longer survival (median, 62.5 months vs 14.2 months; P = .017) and lower prevalence of TP53 disruption (23.1% vs 60.0%; P = .018) and B-cell receptor stereotypy (7.6% vs 50.0%; P = .009). The molecular dissection of RS into biologically distinct categories highlights the genetic heterogeneity of this disorder and provides clinically relevant information for refining the prognostic stratification of patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2010-09-302174

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rossi, D., Spina, V., Deambrogi, C., Rasi, S., Laurenti, L., Stamatopoulos, K., Arcaini, L., Lucioni, M., Rocque, G. B., Xu-Monette, Z. Y., Visco, C., Chang, J., Chigrinova, E., Forconi, F., Marasca, R., Besson, C., Papadaki, T., Paulli, M., Larocca, L. M., Pileri, S. A., Gattei, V., Bertoni, F., Foà, R., Young, K. H., & Gaidano, G.
Venue
Blood
Published
2011-03-24
Volume
117
Issue
12
Pages
3391-3401
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2133545780
Cited by
386
References
0
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.