Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systemic perturbation of cytokine and chemokine networks in Erdheim-Chester disease: a single-center series of 37 patients

Open access
Arnaud, Laurent, Gorochov, Guy, Charlotte, Frédéric, Lvovschi, Virginie, Parizot, Christophe, Larsen, Martin, Ghillani-Dalbin, Pascale, Hervier, Baptiste, Kahn, Jean-Emmanuel, Deback, Claire, Musset, Lucile, Amoura, Zahir, Haroche, Julien·2011·Blood

Abstract

Immunopathogenesis of Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), a rare non–Langerhans cell histiocytosis, is poorly known. In previous studies, various cytokines were detected in ECD lesions, presumably orchestrating lesional histiocyte recruitment. Because ECD lesions are frequently associated with systemic symptoms, we postulated that underlying global immune perturbations might also be revealed. We quantitatively analyzed 23 cytokines in serum samples obtained from a large single-center cohort of 37 patients with ECD, and studied the impact of treatment on cytokine production. IL-6, IL-12, interferon-α (IFN-α), and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) levels were significantly higher in untreated patients than in controls, whereas interferon-γ (IFN-γ) inducible protein 10, IL-12, MCP-1, and IL-1 receptor antagonist were found significantly increased in IFN-α–treated patients. A biomathematical approach was used to rationalize multiparameter data, to generate new hypotheses, and identify global control pathways. Interestingly, cytokine profiles proved to be particularly stable at the individual level, and an “ECD signature” further distinguished patients from controls, based on their production of IFN-α, IL-12, MCP-1, IL-4, and IL-7. Altogether, our data underline the systemic immune Th-1–oriented perturbation associated with this condition and provide clues for the choice of more focused therapeutic agents in this rare disease with noncodified therapeutic management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2010-10-313510

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Arnaud, L., Gorochov, G., Charlotte, F., Lvovschi, V., Parizot, C., Larsen, M., Ghillani-Dalbin, P., Hervier, B., Kahn, J.-E., Deback, C., Musset, L., Amoura, Z., & Haroche, J.
Venue
Blood
Published
2011-03-10
Volume
117
Issue
10
Pages
2783-2790
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2077495741
Cited by
176
References
2
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systemic perturbation of cytokine and chemokine networks in Erdheim-Chester disease: a single-center series of 37 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2010-10-313510
The paper
Arnaud, L., Gorochov, G., Charlotte, F., Lvovschi, V., Parizot, C., Larsen, M., Ghillani-Dalbin, P., Hervier, B., Kahn, J.-E., Deback, C., Musset, L., Amoura, Z., & Haroche, J. (2011). Systemic perturbation of cytokine and chemokine networks in Erdheim-Chester disease: a single-center series of 37 patients. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-10-313510

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.