Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus reduced-dose bortezomib, thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Moreau, Philippe, Avet-Loiseau, Herve, Facon, Thierry, Attal, Michel, Tiab, Mourad, Hulin, Cyrille, Doyen, Chantal, Garderet, Laurent, Randriamalala, Edouard, Araujo, Carla, Lepeu, Gérard, Marit, Gerald, Caillot, Denis, Escoffre, Martine, Lioure, Bruno, Benboubker, Lotfi, Pégourié, Brigitte, Kolb, Brigitte, Stoppa, Anne Marie, Fuzibet, Jean-Gabriel, Decaux, Olivier, Dib, Mamoun, Berthou, Christian, Chaleteix, Carine, Sebban, Catherine, Traullé, Catherine, Fontan, Jean, Wetterwald, Marc, Lenain, Pascal, Mathiot, Claire, Harousseau, Jean-Luc·2011·Blood

Abstract

The Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome conducted a randomized trial to compare bortezomib-dexamethasone (VD) as induction before high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to a combination consisting of reduced doses of bortezomib and thalidomide plus dexamethasone (vtD) in patients with multiple myeloma. Overall, a total of 199 patients were centrally randomly assigned to receive VD or vtD. After 4 cycles, the complete response (CR) rate was the same in both groups (13% in the vtD arm, 12% in the VD arm, P = .74). However, the CR plus very good partial response (VGPR) rate was significantly higher in the vtD arm (49% vs 36%, P = .05). After ASCT, the CR plus VGPR rate was significantly higher in the vtD arm (74% vs 58%, P = .02). The reduced doses of bortezomib and thalidomide translated into a reduced incidence of peripheral neuropathy (PN): grade ≥ 2 PN were reported in 34% in the VD arm versus 14% in the vtD arm (P = .001). vtD, including reduced doses of bortezomib and thalidomide, yields higher VGPR rates compared with VD and can be considered a new effective triplet combination before HDT/ASCT. This study was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00910897 and EudraCT as #2007-005204-40.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2011-05-355081

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Moreau, P., Avet-Loiseau, H., Facon, T., Attal, M., Tiab, M., Hulin, C., Doyen, C., Garderet, L., Randriamalala, E., Araujo, C., Lepeu, G., Marit, G., Caillot, D., Escoffre, M., Lioure, B., Benboubker, L., Pégourié, B., Kolb, B., Stoppa, A. M., Fuzibet, J.-G., Decaux, O., Dib, M., Berthou, C., Chaleteix, C., Sebban, C., Traullé, C., Fontan, J., Wetterwald, M., Lenain, P., Mathiot, C., & Harousseau, J.-L.
Venue
Blood
Published
2011-11-24
Volume
118
Issue
22
Pages
5752-5758
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2071434932
Cited by
303
References
0
FWCI
23.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus reduced-dose bortezomib, thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2011-05-355081
The paper
Moreau, P., Avet-Loiseau, H., Facon, T., Attal, M., Tiab, M., Hulin, C., Doyen, C., Garderet, L., Randriamalala, E., Araujo, C., Lepeu, G., Marit, G., Caillot, D., Escoffre, M., Lioure, B., Benboubker, L., Pégourié, B., Kolb, B., Stoppa, A. M., . . . Harousseau, J.-L. (2011). Bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus reduced-dose bortezomib, thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-05-355081

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.