Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A prospective evaluation of degranulation assays in the rapid diagnosis of familial hemophagocytic syndromes

Open access
Bryceson, Yenan T., Pende, Daniela, Maul-Pavicic, Andrea, Gilmour, Kimberly C., Ufheil, Heike, Vraetz, Thomas, Chiang, Samuel C., Marcenaro, Stefania, Meazza, Raffaella, Bondzio, Ilka, Walshe, Denise, Janka, Gritta, Lehmberg, Kai, Beutel, Karin, zur Stadt, Udo, Binder, Nadine, Arico, Maurizio, Moretta, Lorenzo, Henter, Jan-Inge, Ehl, Stephan·2012·Blood

Abstract

Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (FHL) is a life-threatening disorder of immune regulation caused by defects in lymphocyte cytotoxicity. Rapid differentiation of primary, genetic forms from secondary forms of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is crucial for treatment decisions. We prospectively evaluated the performance of degranulation assays based on surface up-regulation of CD107a on natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes in a cohort of 494 patients referred for evaluation for suspected HLH. Seventy-five of 77 patients (97%) with FHL3-5 and 11 of 13 patients (85%) with Griscelli syndrome type 2 or Chediak-Higashi syndrome had abnormal resting NK-cell degranulation. In contrast, NK-cell degranulation was normal in 14 of 16 patients (88%) with X-linked lymphoproliferative disease and in 8 of 14 patients (57%) with FHL2, who were identified by diminished intracellular SLAM-associated protein (SAP), X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), and perforin expression, respectively. Among 66 patients with a clinical diagnosis of secondary HLH, 13 of 59 (22%) had abnormal resting NK-cell degranulation, whereas 0 of 43 had abnormal degranulation using IL-2–activated NK cells. Active disease or immunosuppressive therapy did not impair the assay performance. Overall, resting NK-cell degranulation below 5% provided a 96% sensitivity for a genetic degranulation disorder and a specificity of 88%. Therefore, degranulation assays allow a rapid and reliable classification of patients, benefiting treatment decisions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2011-08-374199

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Bryceson, Y. T., Pende, D., Maul-Pavicic, A., Gilmour, K. C., Ufheil, H., Vraetz, T., Chiang, S. C., Marcenaro, S., Meazza, R., Bondzio, I., Walshe, D., Janka, G., Lehmberg, K., Beutel, K., zur Stadt, U., Binder, N., Arico, M., Moretta, L., Henter, J.-I., & Ehl, S.
Venue
Blood
Published
2012-03-22
Volume
119
Issue
12
Pages
2754-2763
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2052632028
Cited by
310
References
41
FWCI
16.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective evaluation of degranulation assays in the rapid diagnosis of familial hemophagocytic syndromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2011-08-374199
The paper
Bryceson, Y. T., Pende, D., Maul-Pavicic, A., Gilmour, K. C., Ufheil, H., Vraetz, T., Chiang, S. C., Marcenaro, S., Meazza, R., Bondzio, I., Walshe, D., Janka, G., Lehmberg, K., Beutel, K., zur Stadt, U., Binder, N., Arico, M., Moretta, L., Henter, J.-I., & Ehl, S. (2012). A prospective evaluation of degranulation assays in the rapid diagnosis of familial hemophagocytic syndromes. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-08-374199

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.