Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 472

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Outcome of relapsed adult lymphoblastic leukemia depends on response to salvage chemotherapy, prognostic factors, and performance of stem cell transplantation

Open access
Gökbuget, Nicola, Stanze, Daniel, Beck, Joachim, Diedrich, Helmut, Horst, Heinz-August, Hüttmann, Andreas, Kobbe, Guido, Kreuzer, Karl-Anton, Leimer, Lothar, Reichle, Albrecht, Schaich, Markus, Schwartz, Stefan, Serve, Hubert, Starck, Michael, Stelljes, Matthias, Stuhlmann, Reingard, Viardot, Andreas, Wendelin, Knut, Freund, Mathias, Hoelzer, Dieter·2012·Blood

Abstract

Despite improvements in first-line therapies, published results on the treatment of relapsed adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) show that prognosis is still poor. The aim of the present retrospective analysis of the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL was to identify prognostic factors and options for improvement. A total of 547 patients with a median age of 33 years (range, 15-55) experiencing their first relapse (406 vs 141 shorter or longer than 18 months from diagnosis) were evaluated. The aim of salvage therapy was to achieve a complete remission (CR) with subsequent a stem cell transplantation (SCT). The CR rate (assessed in Philadelphia chromosome– and BCR-ABL–negative ALL without CNS involvement) after the first salvage in relapse after chemotherapy (n = 224) was 42%. After failure of first salvage (n = 82), the CR rate after second salvage was 33%. In relapse after SCT (n = 48) the CR rate after first salvage was 23%. The median overall survival after relapse was 8.4 months and survival was 24% at 3 years. Prognostic factors for survival were relapse localization, response to salvage, performance of SCT, and age. Overall survival appeared superior compared with previously published studies, likely because of the high rate of SCT in the present study (75%). Further improvement may be achieved with earlier relapse detection and experimental approaches in early relapse. The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00199056 and NCT00198991.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2011-12-399287

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 472

Metadata

Authors
Gökbuget, N., Stanze, D., Beck, J., Diedrich, H., Horst, H.-A., Hüttmann, A., Kobbe, G., Kreuzer, K.-A., Leimer, L., Reichle, A., Schaich, M., Schwartz, S., Serve, H., Starck, M., Stelljes, M., Stuhlmann, R., Viardot, A., Wendelin, K., Freund, M., & Hoelzer, D.
Venue
Blood
Published
2012-09-06
Volume
120
Issue
10
Pages
2032-2041
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1988623079
Cited by
472
References
0
FWCI
18.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome of relapsed adult lymphoblastic leukemia depends on response to salvage chemotherapy, prognostic factors, and performance of stem cell transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2011-12-399287
The paper
Gökbuget, N., Stanze, D., Beck, J., Diedrich, H., Horst, H.-A., Hüttmann, A., Kobbe, G., Kreuzer, K.-A., Leimer, L., Reichle, A., Schaich, M., Schwartz, S., Serve, H., Starck, M., Stelljes, M., Stuhlmann, R., Viardot, A., Wendelin, K., Freund, M., & Hoelzer, D. (2012). Outcome of relapsed adult lymphoblastic leukemia depends on response to salvage chemotherapy, prognostic factors, and performance of stem cell transplantation. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-12-399287

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.