Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 471

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immunopharmacologic response of patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia to continuous infusion of T cell–engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody blinatumomab

Klinger, Matthias, Brandl, Christian, Zugmaier, Gerhard, Hijazi, Youssef, Bargou, Ralf C., Topp, Max S., Gökbuget, Nicola, Neumann, Svenja, Goebeler, Mariele, Viardot, Andreas, Stelljes, Matthias, Brüggemann, Monika, Hoelzer, Dieter, Degenhard, Evelyn, Nagorsen, Dirk, Baeuerle, Patrick A., Wolf, Andreas, Kufer, Peter·2012·Blood

Abstract

T cell–engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE Ab blinatumomab has shown an 80% complete molecular response rate and prolonged leukemia-free survival in patients with minimal residual B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (MRD+ B-ALL). Here, we report that lymphocytes in all patients of a phase 2 study responded to continuous infusion of blinatumomab in a strikingly similar fashion. After start of infusion, B-cell counts dropped to < 1 B cell/μL within an average of 2 days and remained essentially undetectable for the entire treatment period. By contrast, T-cell counts in all patients declined to a nadir within < 1 day and recovered to baseline within a few days. T cells then expanded and on average more than doubled over baseline within 2-3 weeks under continued infusion of blinatumomab. A significant percentage of reappearing CD8+ and CD4+ T cells newly expressed activation marker CD69. Shortly after start of infusion, a transient release of cytokines dominated by IL-10, IL-6, and IFN-γ was observed, which no longer occurred on start of a second treatment cycle. The response of lymphocytes in leukemic patients to continuous infusion of blinatumomab helps to better understand the mode of action of this and other globally T cell–engaging Abs. The trial is registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00560794.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2012-01-400515

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 471

Metadata

Authors
Klinger, M., Brandl, C., Zugmaier, G., Hijazi, Y., Bargou, R. C., Topp, M. S., Gökbuget, N., Neumann, S., Goebeler, M., Viardot, A., Stelljes, M., Brüggemann, M., Hoelzer, D., Degenhard, E., Nagorsen, D., Baeuerle, P. A., Wolf, A., & Kufer, P.
Venue
Blood
Published
2012-06-28
Volume
119
Issue
26
Pages
6226-6233
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1996815863
Cited by
471
References
6
FWCI
32.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunopharmacologic response of patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia to continuous infusion of T cell–engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody blinatumomab. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2012-01-400515
The paper
Klinger, M., Brandl, C., Zugmaier, G., Hijazi, Y., Bargou, R. C., Topp, M. S., Gökbuget, N., Neumann, S., Goebeler, M., Viardot, A., Stelljes, M., Brüggemann, M., Hoelzer, D., Degenhard, E., Nagorsen, D., Baeuerle, P. A., Wolf, A., & Kufer, P. (2012). Immunopharmacologic response of patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia to continuous infusion of T cell–engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody blinatumomab. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-01-400515

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.