Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 500

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Composite end point of graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Open access
Holtan, Shernan G., DeFor, Todd E., Lazaryan, Aleksandr, Bejanyan, Nelli, Arora, Mukta, Brunstein, Claudio G., Blazar, Bruce R., MacMillan, Margaret L., Weisdorf, Daniel J.·2015·Blood

Abstract

Key Points: GRFS is a new composite end point useful for comparing HCT techniques and represents ideal post-HCT recovery. In our cohort of 907 allogeneic HCT recipients, 1-year GRFS was 31%, with best outcomes in recipients of marrow from matched sibling donors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2014-10-609032

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 500

Metadata

Authors
Holtan, S. G., DeFor, T. E., Lazaryan, A., Bejanyan, N., Arora, M., Brunstein, C. G., Blazar, B. R., MacMillan, M. L., & Weisdorf, D. J.
Venue
Blood
Published
2015-02-19
Volume
125
Issue
8
Pages
1333-1338
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2019111335
Cited by
500
References
2
FWCI
32.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composite end point of graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2014-10-609032
The paper
Holtan, S. G., DeFor, T. E., Lazaryan, A., Bejanyan, N., Arora, M., Brunstein, C. G., Blazar, B. R., MacMillan, M. L., & Weisdorf, D. J. (2015). Composite end point of graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-10-609032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.