Cited by 66Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMultiple and Secondary Primary CancersCancer survivorship and care

How I monitor long-term and late effects after blood or marrow transplantation

Open access
Bhatia, Smita, Armenian, Saro H., Landier, Wendy·2017·Blood

Abstract

Blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) is used with curative intent for hematologic malignancies. Conditional on surviving the first 2 years after BMT, 5-year survival generally exceeds 70%. However, the cumulative therapeutic exposures lead to premature onset of chronic health conditions, such that the 15-year cumulative incidence of severe or life-threatening chronic health conditions exceeds 40%, resulting in premature mortality. The high burden of morbidity, coupled with a long latency between BMT and the development of chronic health conditions necessitates life-long risk-based monitoring of the BMT survivors. The issues of how and when to screen BMT survivors for therapy-related complications and exacerbation of preexisting conditions are important and largely unanswered questions. For BMT survivors, screening recommendations must incorporate risks associated with pre-BMT therapy as well as risks related to transplant conditioning and graft-versus-host disease. Here, we describe our approach to monitoring BMT survivors for risk-based screening and early detection of key late-occurring or long-term complications using patient scenarios to illustrate our discussion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2017-03-725671

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 66

Authors
Bhatia, S., Armenian, S. H., & Landier, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
Venue
Blood
Published
2017-09-14
Volume
130
Issue
11
Pages
1302-1314
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2738552573
Cited by
66
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
blood and marrow transplantation, long-term follow-up, late effects, chronic disease, risk-based screening, transplant conditioning, graft-versus-host disease, hematologic malignancies, early detection
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review