Cited by 17CAR-T cell therapy researchAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

CD19-directed fast CART therapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: from bench to bedside

Zhang, Cheng, He, Jiaping, Liu, Li, Wang, Jishi, Wang, Sanbin, Liu, Ligen, Gao, Lei, Gao, Li +11 more·2019·Blood

Abstract

Background CAR-T targeting CD19 has been a success in treating B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, relapse rate is high and the long term survival in pateints is not satisfactory, which is partly due to the limited expansion and persistence of the conventionally-manufactured CAR-T cells. In addition, long manufacturing time and high cost of CAR-T product further limit the wider applications of CAR-T therapy. To solve these issues, we have developed a new manufacturing platform, FasT CAR-T, which shorten the manufacturing time to one day as compared to the conventional CAR-T manufacturing time of 9-14 days, which is critical for patients with rapidly progressing disease. More importantly, CD19-directed FasT CAR-T has been shown to have superior expansion capability, younger and less exhausted phenotype, and higher potency in eliminating B-ALL both in vitro and in vivo. Based on the preclinical study, we initiated a multi-center clinical study to determine the safety, feasibility and efficacy of CD19-FasT CAR-T in treating patients with CD19+ relapsed/refractory B-ALL. Methods CD19-directed CAR-T was manufactured using the FasT CAR-T platform. Peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells were obtained by leukapheresis and T cells were separated. CD19-FasT CAR-T manufacturing were all successful. Conventional CAR-T (C-CAR-T) from healthy donor were also made in parallel for comparison in preclinical study. From Dec. 2018 to July 2019, 10 adult CD19+ R/R ALL patients…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2019-128006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • qPCR assays for the detection of mycoplasma are now standard and reduce assay time from 28 days to 1-2 days.

    “qPCR assays for the detection of mycoplasma are now standard and reduce assay time from 28 days to 1-2 days (124).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 17

Authors
Zhang, C., He, J., Liu, L., Wang, J., Wang, S., Liu, L., Gao, L., Gao, L., Liu, Y., Kong, P., Liu, J., Han, Y., Zhang, Y., Sun, Z., Ye, X., He, Y., Shen, L., Cao, W., & Zhang, X.
Affiliations
  • Army Medical University (CN)
  • Gracell Biotechnology Ltd., Shanghai, China, Shanghai, China
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Guiyang Medical University (CN)
  • Department of Hematology, General Hospital of Kunming Military Region of People's Liberation Army, Kunming, China, Kunming, China
Venue
Blood
Published
2019-11-13
Volume
134
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
1340-1340
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W3002073720
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Blood (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
CD19 CAR T cells, relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, CAR-T cell expansion, CAR T cell persistence, T cell exhaustion, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide conditioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review