Cited by 133Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research

Prevalence of BTK and PLCG2 mutations in a real-life CLL cohort still on ibrutinib after 3 years: a FILO group study

Open access
Quinquenel, Anne, Fornecker, Luc-Matthieu, Letestu, Rémi, Ysebaert, Loïc, Fleury, Carole, Lazarian, Grégory, Dilhuydy, Marie-Sarah, Nollet, Delphine +10 more·2019·Blood

Abstract

Mutational analyses performed following acquired ibrutinib resistance have suggested that chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression on ibrutinib is linked to mutations in Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and/or phospholipase Cγ2 (PLCG2) genes. Mutational information for patients still on ibrutinib is limited. We report a study aimed to provide a “snapshot” of the prevalence of mutations in a real-life CLL cohort still on ibrutinib after at least 3 years of treatment. Of 204 patients who initiated ibrutinib via an early-access program at 29 French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO) centers, 63 (31%) were still on ibrutinib after 3 years and 57 provided a fresh blood sample. Thirty patients had a CLL clone ≥0.5 × 109/L, enabling next-generation sequencing (NGS); BTK and PLCG2 mutations were detected in 57% and 13% of the NGS samples, respectively. After median follow-up of 8.5 months from sample collection, the presence of a BTK mutation was significantly associated with subsequent CLL progression (P = .0005 vs no BTK mutation). Our findings support that mutational analysis should be considered in patients receiving ibrutinib who have residual clonal lymphocytosis, and that clinical trials are needed to evaluate whether patients with a BTK mutation may benefit from an early switch to another treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.2019000854

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The second most common BTKi resistance mechanism described in patients with CLL is mutation of PLCG2.

    “The second most common BTKi resistance mechanism described in patients with CLL is mutation ofPLCG2(26).”

    From Resistance Mechanisms and Approach to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia after BTK Inhibitor Therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction links PLCG2 mutations to acquired ibrutinib resistance, and the Results and discussion report PLCG2 mutations in 13% of tested patients, versus BTK mutations in 57%. But this cohort was still receiving ibrutinib, and the paper does not establish that PLCG2 mutation is the second most common resistance mechanism across BTK inhibitors in patients with CLL. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In published studies of disease progression during BTKi therapy, approximately 35% of patients were found to have a BTK mutation alone, an additional 10% had coexisting mutations in PLCG2, 5% had a PLCG2 mutation alone, and the remaining 50% were wild-type for BTK and PLCG2.

    “In published studies of disease progression during BTKi therapy,approximately 35% of patients were found to have aBTK mutation alone, an additional 10% had a coexisting mutations in PLCG2, 5% of cases had a PLCG2mutation alone, and the remaining 50% were wild-type (WT) for BTK and PLCG2 (Figure 2)(12, 19, 21–31).”

    From Resistance Mechanisms and Approach to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia after BTK Inhibitor Therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results and discussion (page not provided) report BTK-only and coexisting BTK/PLCG2 mutations among two patients profiled at relapse, so the paper supports those mutation patterns during progression. It does not report the claimed 35%/10%/5%/50% distribution across published studies; its main prevalence figures concern patients still on ibrutinib after three years, not a pooled group of patients progressing during therapy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Byrd JC, Furman RR, Coutre SE, et al. Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(8):786]. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(1):32-42.
  2. Byrd JC, Brown JR, O'Brien S, et al; RESONATE Investigators. Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in previously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(3):213-223.
  3. O'Brien S, Furman RR, Coutre SE, et al. Ibrutinib as initial therapy for elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma: an open-label, mul- ticentre, phase 1b/2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(1):48-58.
  4. Burger JA, Tedeschi A, Barr PM, et al; RESONATE-2 Investigators. Ibrutinib as initial therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(25): 2425-2437.
  5. Brown JR, Hillmen P, O'Brien S, et al. Extended follow-up and impact of high-risk prognostic factors from the phase 3 RESONATE study in patients with previously treated CLL/SLL. Leukemia. 2018;32(1):83-91.
  6. Byrd JC, Furman RR, Coutre SE, et al. Three- year follow-up of treatment-naïve and pre- viously treated patients with CLL and SLL receiving single-agent ibrutinib. Blood. 2015; 125(16):2497-2506.
  7. Coutr é SE, Furman RR, Flinn IW, et al. Extended treatment with single-agent ibrutinib at the 420 mg dose leads to durable responses in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/ small lymphocytic lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(5):1149-1155.
  8. O'Brien S, Furman RR, Coutre S, et al. Single-agent ibrutinib in treatment-naive and relapsed/ refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a 5-year experience. Blood. 2018;131(17):1910-1919.
  9. Barr PM, Robak T, Owen C, et al. Sustained efficacy and detailed clinical follow-up of first- line ibrutinib treatment in older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: extended phase 3 results from RESONATE-2. Haematologica. 2018;103(9):1502-1510.
  10. Mato AR, Hill BT, Lamanna N, et al. Optimal sequencing of ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from a multicenter study of 683 patients. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(5):1050-1056.
  11. Mato AR, Roeker LE, Allan JN, et al. Outcomes of front-line ibrutinib treated CLL patients excluded from landmark clinical trial. Am J Hematol. 2018;93(11):1394-1401.
  12. Winqvist M, Andersson PO, Asklid A, et al; Swedish CLL Group. Long-term real-world results of ibrutinib therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 30-month follow up of the Swedish compassionate use cohort [published online ahead of print 4 December 2018]. Haematologica. 2019;104(5):e208-e210.
  13. Woyach JA, Ruppert AS, Guinn D, et al. BTKC481S-mediated resistance to ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(13):1437-1443.
  14. Furman RR, Cheng S, Lu P, et al. Ibrutinib resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2014;370(26):2547].
  15. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(24):2352-2354.
  16. Sharma S, Galanina N, Guo A, et al. Identification of a structurally novel BTK mu- tation that drives ibrutinib resistance in CLL. Oncotarget. 2016;7(42):68833-68841.
  17. Ahn IE, Underbayev C, Albitar A, et al. Clonal evolution leading to ibrutinib resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2017; 129(11):1469-1479.
  18. Lampson BL, Brown JR. Are BTK and PLCG2 mutations necessary and sufficient for ibrutinib resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia? Expert Rev Hematol. 2018;11(3):185-194.
  19. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al. iwCLL guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and sup- portive management of CLL. Blood. 2018; 131(25):2745-2760.
  20. Cheson BD, Byrd JC, Rai KR, et al. Novel targeted agents and the need to refine clinical end points in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(23):2820-2822.
  21. Thompson PA, Burger JA. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors: first and second generation agents for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2018;27(1):31-42.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quinquenel, A., Fornecker, L.-M., Letestu, R., Ysebaert, L., Fleury, C., Lazarian, G., Dilhuydy, M.-S., Nollet, D., Guieze, R., Feugier, P., Roos-Weil, D., Willems, L., Michallet, A.-S., Delmer, A., Hormigos, K., Levy, V., Cymbalista, F., & Baran-Marszak, F.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole (FR)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR)
  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France;
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR)
  • Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France;
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • Centre Léon Bérard (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Groupe de Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Seine-Saint-Denis (GHUPSSD), Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Bobigny, France;
Corresponding author
  • Quinquenel, Anne
  • Fornecker, Luc-Matthieu
  • Cymbalista, Florence
Venue
Blood
Published
2019-08-15
Volume
134
Issue
7
Pages
641-644
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2954828829
Cited by
133
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 3
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sunesis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Keywords
chronic lymphocytic leukemia, ibrutinib, Bruton's tyrosine kinase, BTK mutations, PLCG2 mutations, acquired drug resistance, mutation analysis, real-world cohort, early access program
MeSH terms
Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase, Adenine, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Pyrimidines, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Disease Progression, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Phospholipase C gamma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review