The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Campath-1H antibody on human hematopoietic progenitors in vitro
Open accessAbstract
The humanized antibody CAMPATH-1H has been shown in pilot studies to be beneficial in the treatment of lymphoid malignancy and other lymphoproliferative diseases. The antigen recognized by this antibody is not confined to lymphoid cells, and work with rat antibodies of similar specificity has not eliminated the possibility of damage to human hematopoietic progenitors, particularly those capable of repopulating bone marrow and sustaining hematopoiesis. This study aimed to discover if hematopoietic progenitor cells were affected by treatment with CAMPATH-1H, with or without human complement. Bone marrow mononuclear cells from healthy volunteers were treated with saturating concentrations of CAMPATH-1H, human complement, or CAMPATH- 1H plus human complement. The CD34-positive fraction of the mononuclear cells was treated similarly. Residual progenitor activity was measured in the colony-forming unit-granulocyte, erythroid, monocyte, megakaryocyte assay and compared with untreated controls. There was no significant difference (at the 5% level) between treated and control cells. Mononuclear cells were divided into CAMPATH-1H-positive and CAMPATH-1H-negative fractions by fluorescein isothiocyanate-CAMPATH-1H labeling and fluorescence-activated cell sorter separation. Hematopoietic progenitors were predominantly found in the CAMPATH-1H- negative fraction. Furthermore, mononuclear cells treated with CAMPATH- 1H and complement were equivalent to controls in experiments that investigated the capacity of these cells to form hematopoietic foci in long-term cultures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alemtuzumab Compared With Chlorambucil As First-Line Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Hillmen, P., Skotnicki, A. B., Robak, T., Jaksic, B., Dmoszynska, A., Wu, J., Sirard, C., & Mayer, J. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.12.9098 · Cited by 561
Osterborg, A., Dyer, M. J., Bunjes, D., Pangalis, G. A., Bastion, Y., Catovsky, D., & Mellstedt, H. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.4.1567 · Cited by 512
Lundin, J., Kimby, E., Björkholm, M., Broliden, P.-A., Celsing, F., Hjalmar, V., Möllgård, L., Rebello, P., Hale, G., Waldmann, H., et al. (2002) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2002-01-0159 · Cited by 497
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease
Hsieh, M. M., Kang, E. M., Fitzhugh, C. D., Link, M. B., Bolan, C. D., Kurlander, R., Childs, R. W., Rodgers, G. P., Powell, J. D., & Tisdale, J. F. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0904971 · Cited by 455
Infectious Complications of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
WADHWA, P., & MORRISON, V (2006) · Seminars in Oncology · doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.12.013 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilleece, M., & Dexter, T.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 1993-08-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 807-812
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W83807906
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Campath-1H antibody on human hematopoietic progenitors in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v82.3.807.807
- The paper
- Gilleece, M., & Dexter, T. (1993). Effect of Campath-1H antibody on human hematopoietic progenitors in vitro. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v82.3.807.807
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.