The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A point mutation in the catalytic domain of c-kit induces growth factor independence, tumorigenicity, and differentiation of mast cells
Abstract
The murine W and Steel loci encode the Kit receptor tyrosine kinase and its ligand, Steel factor, respectively. Loss of function mutations at either the W or Sl loci lead to a variety of pleiotropic developmental defects, including mast cell deficiency and severe macrocytic anemia. In addition to these loss-of-function mutations, gain-of-function mutations in c-kit, leading to constitutive activation of the Kit receptor, have also been identified in both rodent and human mastocytomas. In this study, we have examined the transforming potential and biologic effects of a point mutation that results in substitution of the aspartic acid at codon 814 in the cytoplasmic kinase domain to tyrosine (D814Y) by introducing either wild-type (Kit) or mutant KitD814Y (KDY) cDNA into an interleukin-3-dependent mast cell line IC2. Stimulation of cells expressing the wild-type Kit receptor (IC2/Kit) with Steel factor in vitro resulted in a short-term growth response, whereas IC2/KDY cells were capable of sustained proliferation in a ligand-independent manner. In addition, expression of KDY resulted in the oncogenic transformation of IC2 cells, as determined by colony formation in vitro in the absence of exogenous growth factors and the formation of mastocytomas in vivo in syngeneic DBA/2 mice. Surprisingly, KDY expression in IC2 cells triggered dramatic changes in cell size and the extent of granulation. In addition, KDY induced the expression of mouse mast cell protease-4 (MMCP-4) and MMCP-6. In contrast, neither of these molecular or cellular changes was observed in IC2/Kit cells treated with Steel factor. These results show that the D814Y mutation in the cytoplasmic kinase domain of the Kit receptor induces ligand-independent mast cell growth in vitro, tumorigenicity in vivo, and mast cell differentiation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This mutation changes the conformation of the KIT receptor, resulting in altered substrate recognition and constitutive tyrosine autophosphorylation, which leads to a constitutive ligand-independent growth (5-7)”
From Pak and Rac GTPases promote oncogenic KIT–induced neoplasms (2013) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cited by
Bonadonna, P., Perbellini, O., Passalacqua, G., Caruso, B., Colarossi, S., Dal Fior, D., Castellani, L., Bonetto, C., Frattini, F., Dama, A., et al. (2009) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.11.018 · Cited by 392
Mast-cell responses in the development of asthma
Bingham, C. O., & Austen, K. F. (2000) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0091-6749(00)90056-3 · Cited by 80
Pak and Rac GTPases promote oncogenic KIT–induced neoplasms
Martin, H., Mali, R. S., Ma, P., Chatterjee, A., Ramdas, B., Sims, E., Munugalavadla, V., Ghosh, J., Mattingly, R. R., Visconte, V., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci67509 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Piao, X., & Bernstein, A.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 1996-04-15
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3117-3123
- ISSN
- 0006-4971
- 1528-0020
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review