Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Inhibitor Antibody Response Is More Complex in Hemophilia A Patients Than in Most Nonhemophiliacs With Factor VIII Autoantibodies

Open access
Prescott, Richard, Nakai, Hiroaki, Saenko, Evgueni L., Scharrer, Inge, Nilsson, Inga Marie, Humphries, John E., Hurst, Deborah, Bray, Gordon, Scandella, Dorothea, the Recombinate and Kogenate Study Groups·1997·Blood

Abstract

Approximately 25% of hemophilia A patients infused with factor VIII (fVIII) mount an immune response, which leads to its inactivation. Anti-fVIII autoantibodies are also seen rarely in individuals with normal fVIII. We have previously demonstrated that some anti-A2 and anti-C2 domain antibodies are fVIII inhibitors and that many patients have additional inhibitors with a fVIII light chain (LCh) epitope outside C2. Because the contribution of the different antibodies to the plasma inhibitor titer had been examined in a limited number of patients (14), we report in this study a more extensive analysis of 55 plasmas. The dominant inhibitors in 62% (13 of 21) of autoantibody plasmas were directed only against C2 or A2, but not both, whereas this pattern was found in only 15% (5 of 34) of hemophilic plasmas. In addition, anti-A2 inhibitors were present in 71% (24 of 34) of hemophilic plasmas, but only 33% (7 of 21) of autoantibody plasmas. These results demonstrated that the inhibitor response in hemophiliacs was more complex and the epitope specificity was somewhat different. A comparison of hemophiliacs treated only with plasma fVIII or recombinant fVIII showed no significant differences in the complexity of the inhibitor response, as ≥ 2 different inhibitor antibodies were present in 78% (18 of 23) of the former and 82% (9 of 11) of the latter. In contrast, the major inhibitors in 35% (8 of 23) of hemophiliacs treated with plasma fVIII were directed against C2 and another LCh epitope within residues 1649-2137, but not A2, while none (0 of 11) treated with recombinant fVIII had this pattern.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.v89.10.3663

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Prescott, R., Nakai, H., Saenko, E. L., Scharrer, I., Nilsson, I. M., Humphries, J. E., Hurst, D., Bray, G., Scandella, D., & Groups, T. R. A. K. S.
Venue
Blood
Published
1997-05-15
Volume
89
Issue
10
Pages
3663-3671
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2494708045
Cited by
183
References
1
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Inhibitor Antibody Response Is More Complex in Hemophilia A Patients Than in Most Nonhemophiliacs With Factor VIII Autoantibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v89.10.3663
The paper
Prescott, R., Nakai, H., Saenko, E. L., Scharrer, I., Nilsson, I. M., Humphries, J. E., Hurst, D., Bray, G., Scandella, D., & Groups, T. R. A. K. S. (1997). The Inhibitor Antibody Response Is More Complex in Hemophilia A Patients Than in Most Nonhemophiliacs With Factor VIII Autoantibodies. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v89.10.3663

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.