Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prednisone Response Is the Strongest Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Dördelmann, Michael, Reiter, Alfred, Borkhardt, Arndt, Ludwig, Wolf-Dieter, Götz, Nicolai, Viehmann, Susanne, Gadner, Helmut, Riehm, Hansjörg, Schrappe, Martin·1999·Blood

Abstract

To define prognostic factors in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the outcome of 106 infants (age ≤12 months) during 3 consecutive multicenter trials of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster group (ALL-BFM 83, 86, and 90) was retrospectively analyzed according to presenting features and early in vivo response to prednisone. The prednisone response was defined as the cytoreduction (number of blood blasts per microliter at day 8) to a 7-day prednisone prephase and 1 intrathecal dose of methotrexate on day 1. Prednisone good responder (PGR; <1,000 blasts/μL) received conventional therapy and prednisone poor responder (PPR; ≥1,000 blasts/μL) received intensified therapy. Infant ALL was characterized by a high incidence of a white blood cell count greater than 100 × 103/μL (57%), central nervous system leukemia (24%), lack of CD10 expression (59%), 11q23 rearrangement (49%) including the translocation t(4;11) (29%), and a comparatively high proportion of PPR (26%), which were all significantly associated with inferior outcome by univariate analysis. The estimated probability for an event-free survival at 6 years (pEFS) was by far better for PGR compared with PPR, who had a dismal prognosis despite intensified treatment (pEFS, 53% ± 6%v 15% ± 7%, P = .0001). Infant PGR, who were less than 6 months of age (n = 40), lacked CD10 expression (n = 43), and/or had an 11q23 rearrangement (n = 17) fared significantly better compared with corresponding PPR, as indicated by a pEFS of 44% ± 8%, 49% ± 8%, and 41% ± 12%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, PPR was the strongest adverse prognostic factor (relative risk, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 5.8; P< .0001). Infants with PGR, comprising a major subgroup (74%) among infants, might successfully be treated with conventional therapy, whereas PPR require new therapeutic strategies, including early treatment intensification or bone marrow transplantation in first remission.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.v94.4.1209

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Dördelmann, M., Reiter, A., Borkhardt, A., Ludwig, W.-D., Götz, N., Viehmann, S., Gadner, H., Riehm, H., & Schrappe, M.
Venue
Blood
Published
1999-08-15
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
1209-1217
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1912757807
Cited by
341
References
0
FWCI
19.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prednisone Response Is the Strongest Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v94.4.1209
The paper
Dördelmann, M., Reiter, A., Borkhardt, A., Ludwig, W.-D., Götz, N., Viehmann, S., Gadner, H., Riehm, H., & Schrappe, M. (1999). Prednisone Response Is the Strongest Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v94.4.1209

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.