The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Tc1 and Tc2/Tc0 CD8 T-cell clones display distinct cell surface and functional phenotypes
Abstract
It has recently become clear that distinct subsets of CD8 T cells, analogous to their CD4 counterparts, exist in rodents and humans. To examine functional differences between human CD8 T-cell subsets, we generated Tc1, Tc2, and Tc0 T-cell clones from the peripheral blood of healthy individuals. The majority of CD8 T-cell clones generated displayed a classic Tc1 phenotype, but 10% to 20% secreted interleukin (IL)-4 in addition to interferon-γ (Tc0 phenotype). Generation of Tc2 clones was dependent on the use of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 as the primary stimulus. The cytokine profiles of established clones remained susceptible to modification by the addition of IL-12 and IL-4. In addition, IL-12 enhanced and IL-4 inhibited the growth of Tc1 but not Tc2/0 CD8 T-cell clones. Significant functional differences were observed between the subsets. Tc2/0 clones expressed CD30 and CD40 ligand at a much higher level than Tc1 clones. Both Tc1 and Tc2/0 clones showed comparable cytotoxicity and produced similar levels of perforin and Fas L. However, Tc2 clones were much more resistant to activation-induced cell death and less susceptible to apoptosis by direct Fas ligation. Moreover, Tc1 and Tc2 clones had opposing effects on the development of CD4 effectors, promoting type 1 and type 2 responses, respectively. These data provide evidence for profound differences between human CD8 T-cell subsets that may be important in their functions as cytotoxic or immunoregulatory cells. (Blood. 2000;95:231-240)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Le Gros, G., Ben-Sasson, S. Z., Seder, R., Finkelman, F. D., & Paul, W. E. (1990) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.172.3.921 · Cited by 954
Interleukin (IL)-6 directs the differentiation of IL-4-producing CD4+ T cells
Rincón, M., Anguita, J., Nakamura, T., Fikrig, E., & Flavell, R. A. (1997) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.185.3.461 · Cited by 810
Cited by
Mediators of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Barnes, P. J. (2004) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.56.4.2 · Cited by 710
Living and dying for inflammation: neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils
Geering, B., Stoeckle, C., Conus, S., & Simon, H.-U. (2013) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2013.04.002 · Cited by 256
Strategies targeting the IL-4/IL-13 axes in disease
May, R. D., & Fung, M. (2015) · Cytokine · doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2015.05.018 · Cited by 166
Cheng, Y., Wong, M. T., van der Maaten, L., & Newell, E. W. (2016) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1501928 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Vukmanovic-Stejic, M., Vyas, B., Gorak-Stolinska, P., Noble, A., & Kemeny, D. M.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 231-240
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W1831514224
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Tc1 and Tc2/Tc0 CD8 T-cell clones display distinct cell surface and functional phenotypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v95.1.231
- The paper
- Vukmanovic-Stejic, M., Vyas, B., Gorak-Stolinska, P., Noble, A., & Kemeny, D. M. (2000). Human Tc1 and Tc2/Tc0 CD8 T-cell clones display distinct cell surface and functional phenotypes. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v95.1.231
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.