The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Primary and secondary cutaneous CD30+lymphoproliferative disorders: a report from the Dutch Cutaneous Lymphoma Group on the long-term follow-up data of 219 patients and guidelines for diagnosis and treatment
Abstract
To evaluate our diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines, clinical and long-term follow-up data of 219 patients with primary or secondary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders were evaluated. The study group included 118 patients with lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP; group 1), 79 patients with primary cutaneous CD30+ large T-cell lymphoma (LTCL; group 2), 11 patients with CD30+ LTCL and skin and regional lymph node involvement (group 3), and 11 patients with secondary cutaneous CD30+ LTCL (group 4). Patients with LyP often did not receive any specific treatment, whereas most patients with primary cutaneous CD30+ LTCL were treated with radiotherapy or excision. All patients with skin-limited disease from groups 1 and 2 who were treated with multiagent chemotherapy had 1 or more skin relapses. The calculated risk for systemic disease within 10 years of diagnosis was 4% for group 1, 16% for group 2, and 20% for group 3 (after initial therapy). Disease-related 5-year-survival rates were 100% (group 1), 96% (group 2), 91% (group 3), and 24% (group 4), respectively. The results confirm the favorable prognoses of these primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders and underscore that LyP and primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphomas are closely related conditions. They also indicate that CD30+ LTCL on the skin and in 1 draining lymph node station has a good prognosis similar to that for primary cutaneous CD30+ LTCL without concurrent lymph node involvement. Multiagent chemotherapy is only indicated for patients with full-blown or developing extracutaneous disease; it is never or rarely indicated for patients with skin-limited CD30+ lymphomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kim, Y. H., Willemze, R., Pimpinelli, N., Whittaker, S., Olsen, E. A., Ranki, A., Dummer, R., & Hoppe, R. T. (2007) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2006-10-054601 · Cited by 489
Self-citationWillemze, R., Hodak, E., Zinzani, P. L., Specht, L., & Ladetto, M. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy133 · Cited by 281
Self-citationScarisbrick, J. J., Quaglino, P., Prince, H. M., Papadavid, E., Hodak, E., Bagot, M., Servitje, O., Berti, E., Ortiz‐Romero, P., Stadler, R., et al. (2019) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.17258 · Cited by 244
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bekkenk, M. W., Geelen, F. A. M. J., Vader, P. C. V. V., Heule, F., Geerts, M.-L., van Vloten, W. A., Meijer, C. J. L. M., & Willemze, R.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2000-06-15
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3653-3661
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W1495282143
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary and secondary cutaneous CD30+lymphoproliferative disorders: a report from the Dutch Cutaneous Lymphoma Group on the long-term follow-up data of 219 patients and guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v95.12.3653
- The paper
- Bekkenk, M. W., Geelen, F. A. M. J., Vader, P. C. V. V., Heule, F., Geerts, M.-L., van Vloten, W. A., Meijer, C. J. L. M., & Willemze, R. (2000). Primary and secondary cutaneous CD30+lymphoproliferative disorders: a report from the Dutch Cutaneous Lymphoma Group on the long-term follow-up data of 219 patients and guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v95.12.3653
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.