Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impaired antigen presentation by human monocytes during endotoxin tolerance

Wolk, Kerstin, Döcke, Wolf-Dietrich, von Baehr, Volker, Volk, Hans-Dieter, Sabat, Robert·2000·Blood

Abstract

Endotoxin tolerance (ET) has been described as a temporary alteration in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) response of monocytic cells after an initial LPS exposure with respect to the production of soluble immunomodulators. Apart from the LPS response, monocytic cells play an important role in initiation of the specific immune response as antigen-presenting cells. This study investigated the capacity of human blood monocytes to induce T-cell stimulation in ET. First, the expression of monocyte surface molecules, important for T-cell interaction, was analyzed by flow cytometry. In vitro priming of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with LPS clearly down-regulates major histocompatibility complex class II molecules and the costimulatory molecule CD86. Both changes were dependent on the endogenous interleukin (IL)-10 and less so on the transforming growth factor-β. In contrast, other accessory molecules on monocytes were only marginally down-regulated (CD58), were not significantly changed during ET (CD40), or even remained up-regulated after initial LPS priming (CD54, CD80). Second, an impact of these phenotypic alterations on the accessory function of monocytes was observed. This was manifested as diminished T-cell proliferation and interferon (IFN)-γ release in response to the presence of different recall antigens. Neutralizing IL-10 during LPS priming prevented the diminished T-cell IFN-γ production but had little effect on T-cell proliferation. These data confirm that ET is an appropriate model of the monocyte functional state in immunoparalysis, which is frequently observed in patients after septic shock, trauma, or major surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.v96.1.218

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Wolk, K., Döcke, W.-D., von Baehr, V., Volk, H.-D., & Sabat, R.
Venue
Blood
Published
2000-07-01
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
218-223
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1569758706
Cited by
300
References
3
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impaired antigen presentation by human monocytes during endotoxin tolerance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v96.1.218
The paper
Wolk, K., Döcke, W.-D., von Baehr, V., Volk, H.-D., & Sabat, R. (2000). Impaired antigen presentation by human monocytes during endotoxin tolerance. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v96.1.218

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.