The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial
Open accessAbstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older adults carries a poor prognosis, and the optimum treatment remains to be determined. In younger patients, treatment stratification is frequently based upon diagnostic karyotype, which was the most important prognostic factor in the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) AML10 trial. Considered here is whether karyotype is also predictive in older adults; this is done by studying 1065 cases from MRC AML11 (median age, 66 years). Three prognostic groups were distinguished on the basis of response to induction therapy and overall survival (OS). Those with t(15;17), t(8;21), or inv(16) composed the favorable risk group. Overall, these abnormalities predicted a superior complete remission (CR) rate (72%), reflecting relatively low levels of resistant disease (RD) (8%), and lower relapse risk (RR) (56%) associated with superior OS (34% at 5 years). Normal karyotype (CR, 63%; RD, 17%; RR, 78%; OS, 15%) and other noncomplex abnormalities (CR, 53%; RD, 32%; RR, 85%; OS, 10%) composed the intermediate group; while complex karyotype predicted an extremely poor prognosis (CR, 26%; RD, 56%; RR, 91%; OS, 2%). Combining MRC AML10 and AML11 (n = 2677) revealed that the most favorable changes were rarer in older patients (younger than 55 years, 24%; 55 years or older, 7%), while complex abnormalities were more common (6% vs 13%). This study suggests that hierarchical cytogenetic classification identifies biologically distinct subsets of AML that are represented in all age groups. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of karyotype as a critical independent determinant of outcome in older patients with AML, providing a potential framework for stratified treatment approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhu, Y.-M., Das-Gupta, E. P., & Russell, N. H. (1999) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v94.2.733 · Cited by 118
Cited by
Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome
Mardis, E. R., Ding, L., Dooling, D. J., Larson, D. E., McLellan, M. D., Chen, K., Koboldt, D. C., Fulton, R. S., Delehaunty, K. D., McGrath, S. D., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0903840 · Cited by 2,219
Prognostically Useful Gene-Expression Profiles in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Valk, P. J. M., Verhaak, R. G. W., Beijen, M. A., Erpelinck, C. A. J., van Doorn-Khosrovani, S. B. V. W., Boer, J. M., Beverloo, H. B., Moorhouse, M. J., van der Spek, P. J., Löwenberg, B., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040465 · Cited by 1,370
Cytogenetics in acute leukemia
Mrózek, K., Heerema, N. A., & Bloomfield, C. D. (2004) · Blood Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0268-960x(03)00040-7 · Cited by 659
Goldstone, A. H., Burnett, A. K., Wheatley, K., Smith, A. G., Hutchinson, R. M., & Clark, R. E. (2001) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v98.5.1302 · Cited by 438
Survival for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a population-based study
Oran, B., & Weisdorf, D. J. (2012) · Haematologica · doi:10.3324/haematol.2012.066100 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Grimwade, D.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1312-1320
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2162700652
- Cited by
- 918
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v98.5.1312
- The paper
- Grimwade, D. (2001). The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v98.5.1312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.