The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative assessment of hematopoietic chimerism after bone marrow transplantation by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Abstract
We have developed a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay using TaqMan technology (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) for monitoring donor cell engraftment in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. For this purpose, we selected 19 specific sequence polymorphisms belonging to 11 human biallelic loci located on 9 different chromosomes. Using a set of specially designed primers and fluorogenic probes, we evaluated the 19 markers' informativity on a panel of 126 DNA samples from 63 recipient/donor pairs. In more than 90% of these pairs, discrimination between recipient and donor genetic profile was possible. By using serial dilutions of mixed DNAs, we evaluated the linearity and sensitivity of the method. A linear correlation with rhigher than 0.98 and a sensitivity of 0.1% proved reproducible. Fluorescent-based PCR of short tandem repeats (STR-PCR) and real-time PCR chimerism assay were compared with a panel of artificial cell mixtures. The main advantage of the real-time PCR method over STR-PCR chimerism assays is the absence of PCR competition and plateau biases, and results evidenced greater sensitivity and linearity with the real-time PCR method. Furthermore, different samples can be tested in the same PCR run with a final result in fewer than 48 hours. Finally, we prospectively analyzed patients who received allografts and present 4 different clinical situations that illustrate the informativity level of our method. In conclusion, this new assay provides an accurate quantitative assessment of mixed chimerism that can be useful in guiding early implementation of additional treatments in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schuurhuis, G. J., Heuser, M., Freeman, S., Béné, M.-C., Buccisano, F., Cloos, J., Grimwade, D., Haferlach, T., Hills, R. K., Hourigan, C. S., et al. (2018) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2017-09-801498 · Cited by 1,041
von Bahr, L., Batsis, I., Moll, G., Hägg, M., Szakos, A., Sundberg, B., Uzunel, M., Ringden, O., & Le Blanc, K. (2012) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1118 · Cited by 577
Tarte, K., Gaillard, J., Lataillade, J.-J., Fouillard, L., Becker, M., Mossafa, H., Tchirkov, A., Rouard, H., Henry, C., Splingard, M., et al. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-05-219907 · Cited by 430
Non-invasive prenatal determination of fetal sex: translating research into clinical practice
Hill, M., Finning, K., Martin, P., Hogg, J., Meaney, C., Norbury, G., Daniels, G., & Chitty, L. (2011) · Clinical Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01533.x · Cited by 168
Navarro-Bailón, A., Carbonell, D., Escudero, A., Chicano, M., Muñiz, P., Suárez-González, J., Bailén, R., Oarbeascoa, G., Kwon, M., Díez-Martín, J. L., et al. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11090993 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Alizadeh, M., Bernard, M., Danic, B., Dauriac, C., Birebent, B., Lapart, C., Lamy, T., Le Prisé, P.-Y., Beauplet, A., Bories, D., Semana, G., & Quelvennec, E.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2002-06-15
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4618-4625
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2144737390
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative assessment of hematopoietic chimerism after bone marrow transplantation by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v99.12.4618
- The paper
- Alizadeh, M., Bernard, M., Danic, B., Dauriac, C., Birebent, B., Lapart, C., Lamy, T., Le Prisé, P.-Y., Beauplet, A., Bories, D., Semana, G., & Quelvennec, E. (2002). Quantitative assessment of hematopoietic chimerism after bone marrow transplantation by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v99.12.4618
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.