The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of 200 mg/m2 melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m2 melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 9502 randomized trial
Open accessAbstract
High-dose therapy has become a common treatment for myeloma. The objective of this study (Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome [IFM] 9502 trial) was to compare in a prospective and randomized trial the 2 most widely used conditioning regimens before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed symptomatic patients younger than 65 years old: 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m(2) melphalan (arm A) versus 200 mg/m(2) melphalan (arm B). A total of 282 evaluable patients were compared--140 in arm A and 142 in arm B. Baseline characteristics and disease response to 4 cycles of the VAD regimen performed before randomization and autologous stem cell transplantation were identical in the 2 treatment arms. In arm B, hematologic recovery was significantly faster for both the duration of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, transfusion requirements were also significantly lower, and the median duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter. In arm A, the incidence of severe mucositis was significantly increased. The median duration of event-free survival was similar in both arms (21 vs 20.5 months, P =.6), but the 45-month survival was 65.8% in arm B versus 45.5% in arm A (P =.05). This difference might be attributed in part to better salvage regimens after relapse in arm B compared with arm A. We conclude that 200 mg/m(2) melphalan is a less toxic and at least as effective conditioning regimen when compared with 8 Gy total body irradiation with 140 mg/m(2) melphalan. This regimen should be considered as the standard of care before autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Single versus Double Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma
Attal, M., Harousseau, J.-L., Facon, T., Guilhot, F., Doyen, C., Fuzibet, J.-G., Monconduit, M., Hulin, C., Caillot, D., Bouabdallah, R., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032290 · Cited by 984
Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment
Rajkumar, S. V., & Kumar, S. (2016) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.11.007 · Cited by 812
Barlogie, B., Kyle, R. A., Anderson, K. C., Greipp, P. R., Lazarus, H. M., Hurd, D. D., McCoy, J., Moore, D. F., Dakhil, S. R., Lanier, K. S., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.5807 · Cited by 495
Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Kumar, S. K., Callander, N. S., Alsina, M., Atanackovic, D., Biermann, J. S., Chandler, J. C., Costello, C., Faiman, M., Fung, H. C., Gasparetto, C., et al. (2017) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2017.0023 · Cited by 279
Frontline therapy of multiple myeloma
Moreau, P., Attal, M., & Facon, T. (2015) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2014-09-568915 · Cited by 244
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Moreau, P.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 731-735
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2127143739
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of 200 mg/m2 melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m2 melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 9502 randomized trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v99.3.731
- The paper
- Moreau, P. (2002). Comparison of 200 mg/m2 melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m2 melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 9502 randomized trial. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v99.3.731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.