The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of pediatric allogeneic transplant outcomes using myeloablative busulfan with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine
Abstract
Key Points: Children receiving BuFlu for nonmalignant conditions experienced less toxicity than those receiving BuCy, but survival was comparable. Children with malignancy had shorter postrelapse survival with BuFlu than BuCy; transplant-related mortality and relapse were similar.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous studies in allogeneic HSCT seem to show similar efficacy but suggest lower systemic toxic effects and a higher incidence of cytopenias with busulfan–fludarabine conditioning than with busulfan–cyclophosphamide.”
From Hematologic Cancer after Gene Therapy for Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- McDonald, 2010, Hepatobiliary complications of hematopoietic cell transplantation, 40 years on, Hepatology, 51, 1450, 10.1002/hep.23533 · DOI
- Ozkaynak, 1991, Hepatic veno-occlusive disease post-bone marrow transplantation in children conditioned with busulfan and cyclophosphamide: incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcome, Bone Marrow Transplant, 7, 467
- Sencer, 1993, Hemorrhagic cystitis after bone marrow transplantation. Risk factors and complications, Transplantation, 56, 875, 10.1097/00007890-199310000-00020 · DOI
- Gandhi, 2002, Cellular and clinical pharmacology of fludarabine, Clin Pharmacokinet, 41, 93, 10.2165/00003088-200241020-00002 · DOI
- Andersson, 2008, Once daily i.v. busulfan and fludarabine (i.v. Bu-Flu) compares favorably with i.v. busulfan and cyclophosphamide (i.v. BuCy2) as pretransplant conditioning therapy in AML/MDS, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 14, 672, 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.03.009 · DOI
- Chae, 2007, New myeloablative conditioning regimen with fludarabine and busulfan for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: comparison with BuCy2, Bone Marrow Transplant, 40, 541, 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705770 · DOI
- Liu, 2013, Busulfan plus fludarabine as a myeloablative conditioning regimen compared with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective and multicenter study, J Hematol Oncol, 6, 15, 10.1186/1756-8722-6-15 · DOI
- Russell, 2002, Once-daily intravenous busulfan given with fludarabine as conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: study of pharmacokinetics and early clinical outcomes, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 8, 468, 10.1053/bbmt.2002.v8.pm12374451 · DOI
- Bartelink, 2014, Fludarabine and exposure-targeted busulfan compares favorably with busulfan/cyclophosphamide-based regimens in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation: maintaining efficacy with less toxicity, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 20, 345, 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.11.027 · DOI
- Giralt, 2009, Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen workshop: defining the dose spectrum. Report of a workshop convened by the center for international blood and marrow transplant research, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 15, 367, 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.12.497 · DOI
- Przepiorka, 1995, 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading, Bone Marrow Transplant, 15, 825
- Lee, 2002, Severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease: association with treatment-related mortality and relapse, Blood, 100, 406, 10.1182/blood.V100.2.406 · DOI
- Shulman, 1980, Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man. A long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients, Am J Med, 69, 204, 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90380-0 · DOI
- Ben-Barouch, 2016, Busulfan fludarabine vs busulfan cyclophosphamide as a preparative regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis, Bone Marrow Transplant, 51, 232, 10.1038/bmt.2015.238 · DOI · Paper page
- Fedele, 2014, Tolerability and efficacy of busulfan and fludarabine as allogeneic pretransplant conditioning therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: comparison with busulfan and cyclophosphamide regimen, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 14, 493, 10.1016/j.clml.2014.04.006 · DOI
- Lei, 2015, Busulfan plus fludarabine compared with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide as a conditioning regimen prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a meta-analysis, Int J Clin Exp Med, 8, 12064
- Rambaldi, 2015, Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide versus busulfan plus fludarabine as a preparative regimen for allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial, Lancet Oncol, 16, 1525, 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00200-4 · DOI
- de Lima, 2004, Once-daily intravenous busulfan and fludarabine: clinical and pharmacokinetic results of a myeloablative, reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in AML and MDS, Blood, 104, 857, 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0414 · DOI
- Shah, 2014, Factors predictive of relapse of acute leukemia in children after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 20, 1033, 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.03.028 · DOI
- Bitan, 2017, Personalized prognostic risk score for long-term survival for children with acute leukemia after allogeneic transplantation, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 23, 1523, 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.05.011 · DOI
- Lange, 2008, Outcomes in CCG-2961, a children’s oncology group phase 3 trial for untreated pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the children’s oncology group, Blood, 111, 1044, 10.1182/blood-2007-04-084293 · DOI
- Smith, 2005, Long-term results of children with acute myeloid leukemia: a report of three consecutive Phase III trials by the Children’s Cancer Group: CCG 251, CCG 213 and CCG 2891, Leukemia, 19, 2054, 10.1038/sj.leu.2403925 · DOI
- Harris, 2013, Advances in predicting acute GVHD, Br J Haematol, 160, 288, 10.1111/bjh.12142 · DOI
- Andersson, 2002, Busulfan systemic exposure relative to regimen-related toxicity and acute graft-versus-host disease: defining a therapeutic window for i.v. BuCy2 in chronic myelogenous leukemia, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 8, 477, 10.1053/bbmt.2002.v8.pm12374452 · DOI
- Ljungman, 1997, High busulfan concentrations are associated with increased transplant-related mortality in allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients, Bone Marrow Transplant, 20, 909, 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700994 · DOI
- Slattery, 1995, Graft-rejection and toxicity following bone marrow transplantation in relation to busulfan pharmacokinetics, Bone Marrow Transplant, 16, 31
- Pidala, 2010, Pharmacokinetic targeting of intravenous busulfan reduces conditioning regimen related toxicity following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia, J Hematol Oncol, 3, 36, 10.1186/1756-8722-3-36 · DOI
- Bartelink, 2016, Association of busulfan exposure with survival and toxicity after haemopoietic cell transplantation in children and young adults: a multicentre, retrospective cohort analysis, Lancet Haematol, 3, e526, 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30114-4 · DOI
Cited by
Hematologic Cancer after Gene Therapy for Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy
Duncan, C. N., Bledsoe, J. R., Grzywacz, B., Beckman, A., Bonner, M., Eichler, F. S., Kühl, J.-S., Harris, M. H., Slauson, S., Colvin, R. A., et al. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2405541 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, A. C., Boelens, J. J., Ahn, K. W., Fei, M., Abraham, A., Artz, A., Dvorak, C., Frangoul, H., Freytes, C., Gale, R. P., Hong, S., Lazarus, H. M., Loren, A., Mineishi, S., Nishihori, T., O’Brien, T., Williams, K., Pasquini, M. C., & Levine, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Univeristy of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT;
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Princess Maximax Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands;
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, and
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC;
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL;
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA;
- The Children's Hospital at TriStar Centennial and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN;
- Texas Transplant Institute, San Antonio, TX;
- Hematology Research Centre, Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom;
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;
- Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH;
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA;
- Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA;
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL;
- Blood & Marrow Transplant Program, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia;
- Experimental Transplantation and Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
- ORCID
- Venue
- Blood Advances
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2018-05-29
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1198-1206
- ISSN
- 2473-9529
- 2473-9537
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of pediatric allogeneic transplant outcomes using myeloablative busulfan with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/bloodadvances.2018016956
- The paper
- Harris, A. C., Boelens, J. J., Ahn, K. W., Fei, M., Abraham, A., Artz, A., Dvorak, C., Frangoul, H., Freytes, C., Gale, R. P., Hong, S., Lazarus, H. M., Loren, A., Mineishi, S., Nishihori, T., O’Brien, T., Williams, K., Pasquini, M. C., & Levine, J. E. (2018). Comparison of pediatric allogeneic transplant outcomes using myeloablative busulfan with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine. Blood Advances. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2018016956