The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weaning from mechanical ventilation
Abstract
Weaning covers the entire process of liberating the patient from mechanical support and from the endotracheal tube. Many controversial questions remain concerning the best methods for conducting this process. An International Consensus Conference was held in April 2005 to provide recommendations regarding the management of this process. An 11-member international jury answered five pre-defined questions. 1) What is known about the epidemiology of weaning problems? 2) What is the pathophysiology of weaning failure? 3) What is the usual process of initial weaning from the ventilator? 4) Is there a role for different ventilator modes in more difficult weaning? 5) How should patients with prolonged weaning failure be managed? The main recommendations were as follows. 1) Patients should be categorised into three groups based on the difficulty and duration of the weaning process. 2) Weaning should be considered as early as possible. 3) A spontaneous breathing trial is the major diagnostic test to determine whether patients can be successfully extubated. 4) The initial trial should last 30 min and consist of either T-tube breathing or low levels of pressure support. 5) Pressure support or assist–control ventilation modes should be favoured in patients failing an initial trial/trials. 6) Noninvasive ventilation techniques should be considered in selected patients to shorten the duration of intubation but should not be routinely used as a tool for extubation failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delirium as a Predictor of Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
Ely, E. W. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.14.1753 · Cited by 3,073
One-Year Outcomes in Survivors of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Herridge, M. S., Cheung, A. M., Tansey, C. M., Matte-Martyn, A., Diaz-Granados, N., Al-Saidi, F., Cooper, A. B., Guest, C. B., Mazer, C. D., Mehta, S., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022450 · Cited by 2,334 · cited 7×
“Patients who survive the acute phase of critical illness experience a wide range of physical disabilities [74], including: neuromyopathies; muscle wasting, weakness and fatigability; joint deformities and contractures; and the additional residual disease-related damage to specific organ systems.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationRisk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients
Azoulay, E., Pochard, F., Kentish-Barnes, N., Chevret, S., Aboab, J., Adrie, C., Annane, D., Bleichner, G., Bollaert, P. E., Darmon, M., et al. (2005) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200409-1295oc · Cited by 1,332
Azoulay, E., Chevret, S., Leleu, G., Pochard, F., Barboteu, M., Adrie, C., Canoui, P., Le Gall, J. R., & Schlemmer, B. (2000) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-200008000-00061 · Cited by 746
Rehabilitation after critical illness: A randomized, controlled trial.
Jones, C., Skirrow, P., Griffiths, R. D., Humphris, G. H., Ingleby, S., Eddleston, J., Waldmann, C., & Gager, M. (2003) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000089938.56725.33 · Cited by 446
Impact of Body Mass Index on Outcomes Following Critical Care
Tremblay, A., & Bandi, V. (2003) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.123.4.1202 · Cited by 318
Panic Anxiety, Dyspnea, and Respiratory Disease. Theoretical and Clinical Considerations
Smoller, J. W., Pollack, M. H., Otto, M. W., Rosenbaum, J. F., & Kradin, R. L. (1996) · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.154.1.8680700 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure
Rochwerg, B., Brochard, L., Elliott, M. W., Hess, D., Hill, N. S., Nava, S., Navalesi, P., Antonelli, M., Brozek, J., Conti, G., et al. (2017) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.02426-2016 · Cited by 1,668
Evolution of Diaphragm Thickness during Mechanical Ventilation. Impact of Inspiratory Effort
Goligher, E. C., Fan, E., Herridge, M. S., Murray, A., Vorona, S., Brace, D., Rittayamai, N., Lanys, A., Tomlinson, G., Singh, J. M., et al. (2015) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201503-0620oc · Cited by 608
Self-citationBTS/ICS guideline for the ventilatory management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults
Davidson, A. C., Banham, S., Elliott, M., Kennedy, D., Gelder, C., Glossop, A., Church, A. C., Creagh-Brown, B., Dodd, J. W., Felton, T., et al. (2016) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208209 · Cited by 426
Peñuelas, O., Frutos-Vivar, F., Fernández, C., Anzueto, A., Epstein, S. K., Apezteguía, C., González, M., Nin, N., Raymondos, K., Tomicic, V., et al. (2011) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201011-1887oc · Cited by 350
Umbrello, M., Formenti, P., Longhi, D., Galimberti, A., Piva, I., Pezzi, A., Mistraletti, G., Marini, J. J., & Iapichino, G. (2015) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0894-9 · Cited by 343
Metadata
- Authors
- Boles, J.-M., Bion, J., Connors, A., Herridge, M., Marsh, B., Melot, C., Pearl, R., Silverman, H., Stanchina, M., Vieillard-Baron, A., & Welte, T.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2007-04-30
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1033-1056
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2142104245
- Cited by
- 2,064
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 32.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weaning from mechanical ventilation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00010206
- The paper
- Boles, J.-M., Bion, J., Connors, A., Herridge, M., Marsh, B., Melot, C., Pearl, R., Silverman, H., Stanchina, M., Vieillard-Baron, A., & Welte, T. (2007). Weaning from mechanical ventilation. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00010206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
