Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of linezolid containing regimens in treating MDR-TB and XDR-TB: systematic review and meta-analysis

Sotgiu, Giovanni, Centis, Rosella, D'Ambrosio, Lia, Alffenaar, Jan-William C., Anger, Holly A., Caminero, Jose A., Castiglia, Paolo, De Lorenzo, Saverio, Ferrara, Giovanni, Koh, Won-Jung, Schecter, Giesela F., Shim, Tae S., Singla, Rupak, Skrahina, Alena, Spanevello, Antonio, Udwadia, Zarir F., Villar, Miquel, Zampogna, Elisabetta, Zellweger, Jean-Pierre, Zumla, Alimuddin, Migliori, Giovanni Battista·2012·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Linezolid is used off-label to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in absence of systematic evidence. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy, safety and tolerability of linezolid-containing regimes based on individual data analysis. 12 studies (11 countries from three continents) reporting complete information on safety, tolerability, efficacy of linezolid-containing regimes in treating MDR-TB cases were identified based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using the individual data of 121 patients with a definite treatment outcome (cure, completion, death or failure). Most MDR-TB cases achieved sputum smear (86 (92.5%) out of 93) and culture (100 (93.5%) out of 107) conversion after treatment with individualised regimens containing linezolid (median (inter-quartile range) times for smear and culture conversions were 43.5 (21–90) and 61 (29–119) days, respectively) and 99 (81.8%) out of 121 patients were successfully treated. No significant differences were detected in the subgroup efficacy analysis (daily linezolid dosage ≤600 mg versus>600 mg). Adverse events were observed in 63 (58.9%) out of 107 patients, of which 54 (68.4%) out of 79 were major adverse events that included anaemia (38.1%), peripheral neuropathy (47.1%), gastro-intestinal disorders (16.7%), optic neuritis (13.2%) and thrombocytopenia (11.8%). The proportion of adverse events was significantly higher when the linezolid daily dosage exceeded 600 mg. The study results suggest an excellent efficacy but also the necessity of caution in the prescription of linezolid.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00022912

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
Sotgiu, G., Centis, R., D'Ambrosio, L., Alffenaar, J.-W. C., Anger, H. A., Caminero, J. A., Castiglia, P., De Lorenzo, S., Ferrara, G., Koh, W.-J., Schecter, G. F., Shim, T. S., Singla, R., Skrahina, A., Spanevello, A., Udwadia, Z. F., Villar, M., Zampogna, E., Zellweger, J.-P., Zumla, A., & Migliori, G. B.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2012-04-10
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
1430-1442
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2108960489
Cited by
416
References
0
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy, safety and tolerability of linezolid containing regimens in treating MDR-TB and XDR-TB: systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00022912
The paper
Sotgiu, G., Centis, R., D'Ambrosio, L., Alffenaar, J.-W. C., Anger, H. A., Caminero, J. A., Castiglia, P., De Lorenzo, S., Ferrara, G., Koh, W.-J., Schecter, G. F., Shim, T. S., Singla, R., Skrahina, A., Spanevello, A., Udwadia, Z. F., Villar, M., Zampogna, E., Zellweger, J.-P., . . . Migliori, G. B. (2012). Efficacy, safety and tolerability of linezolid containing regimens in treating MDR-TB and XDR-TB: systematic review and meta-analysis. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00022912

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.