Cited by 133Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesNursing care and research

A self-management programme for COPD: a randomised controlled trial

Open access
Mitchell, Katy E., Johnson-Warrington, Vicki, Apps, Lindsay D., Bankart, John, Sewell, Louise, Williams, Johanna E., Rees, Karen, Jolly, Kate +3 more·2014·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Studies of programmes of self-management support for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been inconclusive. The Self-Management Programme of Activity, Coping and Education (SPACE) FOR COPD is a 6-week self-management intervention for COPD, and this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention in primary care. A single-blind randomised controlled trial recruited people with COPD from primary care and randomised participants to receive usual care or SPACE FOR COPD. Outcome measures were performed at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months. The primary outcome was symptom burden, measured by the self-reported Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ-SR) dyspnoea domain. Secondary outcomes included other domains of the CRQ-SR, shuttle walking tests, disease knowledge, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, smoking status and healthcare utilisation. 184 people with COPD were recruited and randomised. At 6 weeks, there were significant differences between groups in CRQ-SR dyspnoea, fatigue and emotion scores, exercise performance, anxiety, and disease knowledge. At 6 months, there was no between-group difference in change in CRQ-SR dyspnoea. Exercise performance, anxiety and smoking status were significantly different between groups at 6 months, in favour of the intervention. This brief self-management intervention did not improve dyspnoea over and above usual care at 6 months; however, there were gains in anxiety, exercise performance, and disease knowledge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00047814

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 133

Authors
Mitchell, K. E., Johnson-Warrington, V., Apps, L. D., Bankart, J., Sewell, L., Williams, J. E., Rees, K., Jolly, K., Steiner, M., Morgan, M., & Singh, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB)
  • Keele University (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2014-09-03
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1538-1547
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2135105002
Cited by
133
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0808-17146, WMCLAHRC-2014-1)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K00414X/1)
  • Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, self-management interventions, primary care, dyspnea, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, exercise performance, anxiety, depression, disease knowledge, smoking, self-efficacy, health care utilization, fatigue
MeSH terms
Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Dyspnea, Exercise Test, Female, Health Services, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, Smoking, Single-Blind Method, Self Efficacy, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Risk Reduction Behavior, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review