Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A randomised controlled trial of azithromycin to prevent chronic rejection after lung transplantation

Open access
Vos, R., Vanaudenaerde, B.M., Verleden, S.E., De Vleeschauwer, S.I., Willems-Widyastuti, A., Van Raemdonck, D.E., Schoonis, A., Nawrot, T.S., Dupont, L.J., Verleden, G.M.·2011·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Azithromycin reduces airway inflammation and improves forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) in chronic rejection or bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation (LTx). Azithromycin prophylaxis might prevent BOS. A double-blind randomised controlled trial of azithromycin (n = 40) or placebo (n = 43), initiated at discharge and administered three times a week for 2 yrs, was performed in 2005–2009 at the Leuven University Hospital (Leuven, Belgium). Primary end-points were BOS-free and overall survival 2 yrs after LTx; secondary end-points were acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis and pneumonitis rate, prevalence of pseudomonal airway colonisation or gastro-oesophageal reflux, and change in FEV 1 , airway and systemic inflammation over time. Patients developing BOS were assessed for change in FEV 1 with open-label azithromycin. BOS occurred less in patients receiving azithromycin: 12.5 versus 44.2% (p = 0.0017). BOS-free survival was better with azithromycin (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.092–0.816; p = 0.020). Overall survival, acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, pneumonitis, colonisation and reflux were comparable between groups. Patients receiving azithromycin demonstrated better FEV 1 (p = 0.028), and lower airway neutrophilia (p = 0.015) and systemic C-reactive protein levels (p = 0.050) over time. Open-label azithromycin for BOS improved FEV 1 in 52.2% patients. No serious adverse events were noted. Azithromycin prophylaxis attenuates local and systemic inflammation, improves FEV 1 and reduces BOS 2 yrs after LTx.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00068310

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Vos, R., Vanaudenaerde, B. M., Verleden, S. E., De Vleeschauwer, S. I., Willems-Widyastuti, A., Van Raemdonck, D. E., Schoonis, A., Nawrot, T. S., Dupont, L. J., & Verleden, G. M.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2010-06-18
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
164-172
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2115591184
Cited by
268
References
1
FWCI
22.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomised controlled trial of azithromycin to prevent chronic rejection after lung transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00068310
The paper
Vos, R., Vanaudenaerde, B. M., Verleden, S. E., De Vleeschauwer, S. I., Willems-Widyastuti, A., Van Raemdonck, D. E., Schoonis, A., Nawrot, T. S., Dupont, L. J., & Verleden, G. M. (2011). A randomised controlled trial of azithromycin to prevent chronic rejection after lung transplantation. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00068310

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.