Cited by 277Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Macitentan for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the randomised controlled MUSIC trial

Open access
Raghu, Ganesh, Million-Rousseau, Rachel, Morganti, Adele, Perchenet, Loїc, Behr, Juergen, the MUSIC Study Group·2013·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a progressive, fatal disease. This prospective, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase II trial (NCT00903331) investigated the efficacy and safety of the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eligible subjects were adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis of <3 years duration and a histological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia on surgical lung biopsy. The primary objective was to demonstrate that macitentan (10 mg once daily) positively affected forced vital capacity versus placebo. Using a centralised system, 178 subjects were randomised (2:1) to macitentan (n=119) or placebo (n=59). The median change from baseline up to month 12 in forced vital capacity was -0.20 L in the macitentan arm and -0.20 L in the placebo arm. Overall, no differences between treatments were observed in pulmonary function tests or time to disease worsening or death. Median exposures to macitentan and placebo were 14.5 months and 15.0 months, respectively. Alanine and/or aspartate aminotransferase elevations over three times upper limit of normal arose in 3.4% of macitentan-treated subjects and 5.1% of placebo recipients. In conclusion, the primary objective was not met. Long-term exposure to macitentan was well tolerated with a similar, low incidence of elevated hepatic aminotransferases in each treatment group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00104612

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bosentan, macitentan, ambrisentan, and sildenafil all failed to improve physiological or symptomatic measures compared with placebo in IPF.

    “Bosentan [64,65], macitentan [66], ambrisentan [67] and sildenafil [63,68] all failed to demonstrate improved physiological or symptomatic measures compared to placebo.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 277

Authors
Raghu, G., Million-Rousseau, R., Morganti, A., Perchenet, L., Behr, J., & the MUSIC Study Group
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Actelion (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2013-05-16
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
1622-1632
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2143487186
Cited by
277
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
25.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Ankara Universitesi
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Drexel University
  • National Jewish Health
  • University of Alberta
  • Ege Üniversitesi
  • University of California, Davis
  • College of Medicine, Drexel University
  • Actelion Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
macitentan, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, endothelin receptor antagonists, forced vital capacity, usual interstitial pneumonia, drug safety, lung function decline
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alanine Transaminase, Aspartate Aminotransferases, Double-Blind Method, Dyspnea, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Liver, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Pyrimidines, Sulfonamides, Vital Capacity, Treatment Outcome, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Endothelin Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review