The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interpretation of treatment changes in 6-minute walk distance in patients with COPD
Open accessAbstract
There is uncertainty about the interpretation of changes in the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and whether the minimal important difference (MID) for this useful outcome measure exists. Data were used from nine trials enrolling a wide spectrum of COPD patients with 6MWD at baseline and follow-up and used to determine threshold values for important changes in 6MWD using three distribution-based methods. Anchor-based methods to determine a MID were also evaluated. Data were included of 460 COPD patients with a mean±sd forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1) of 39.2±14.1% predicted and 6MWD of 361±112 m at baseline. Threshold values for important effects in 6MWD were between 29 and 42 m, respectively, using the empirical rule effect size and the standardised response mean. The threshold value was 35 m (95% confidence interval 30–42 m) based on the standard error of measurement. Correlations of 6MWD with patient-reported anchors were too low to provide meaningful MID estimates. 6-min walk distance should change by ∼35 m for patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in order to represent an important effect. This corresponds to a 10% change of baseline 6-min walk distance. The low correlations of 6-min walk distance with patient-reported anchors question whether a minimal important difference exists for the 6-min walk distance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“but only the pilot group surpassed all other estimates for the minimum clinically important difference, 30,31 with a value of 54 m (95% CI 37-71 m).32”
From Cognitive behavioral therapy for management of dyspnea: A pilot study (2015) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics
Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713 · Cited by 11,747
Bootstrap Methods and their Application
Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802843 · Cited by 7,350
Bootstrap Methods and Their Application
Loughin, T. M., Davison, A. C., & HINKLEY, D. V. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669707 · Cited by 5,478
Celli, B. R., Cote, C. G., Marin, J. M., Casanova, C., Montes de Oca, M., Mendez, R. A., Pinto Plata, V., & Cabral, H. J. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021322 · Cited by 4,015
The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire
Jones, P., Quirk, F. H., & Baveystock, C. M. (1991) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0954-6111(06)80166-6 · Cited by 2,729
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
McCarthy, B., Casey, D., Devane, D., Murphy, K., Murphy, E., & Lacasse, Y. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003793.pub3 · Cited by 2,643
Revicki, D. A., Hays, R. D., Cella, D. F., & Sloan, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012 · Cited by 2,384
American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement on pulmonary rehabilitation
Nici, L., Donner, C., Wouters, E., Zuwallack, R., Ambrosino, N., Bourbeau, J., Carone, M., Celli, B., Engelen, M., Fahy, B., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200508-1211st · Cited by 1,966
Self-citationDetermining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire
JUNIPER, E. (1994) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)90036-1 · Cited by 1,824
A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease
Guyatt, G. H., Berman, L. B., Townsend, M., Pugsley, S. O., & Chambers, L. W. (1987) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.42.10.773 · Cited by 1,721
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 2004, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, CD003793
- Krauza MA, Alhajhusain A, Khan AI, Shaffer M, Kufel TJ, Mador MJ. Interval compared with continuous exercise training in patients with COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173: A220
- 2003, Cancer Integrative Med, 1, 41
- 2003, Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci, 45, 13
- 1984, Physiotherapy, 70, 258
- 1985, Eur J Respir Dis, 67, 159
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spruit, M. A., Singh, S. J., Garvey, C., ZuWallack, R., Nici, L., Rochester, C., Hill, K., Holland, A. E., Lareau, S. C., Man, W. D.-C., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201309-1634st · Cited by 3,938
Self-citationHolland, A. E., Spruit, M. A., Troosters, T., Puhan, M. A., Pepin, V., Saey, D., McCormack, M. C., Carlin, B. W., Sciurba, F. C., Pitta, F. D. O., et al. (2014) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00150314 · Cited by 2,558
Self-citationPulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Puhan, M. A., Gimeno‐Santos, E., Cates, C. J., & Troosters, T. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005305.pub4 · Cited by 1,014
Self-citationSingh, S., Puhan, M. A., Andrianopoulos, V., Hernandes, N. A., Mitchell, K. E., Hill, C. J., Lee, A. L., Camillo, C. A., Troosters, T., Spruit, M. A., et al. (2014) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00150414 · Cited by 975
Self-citationThe 6-min walk distance in healthy subjects: reference standards from seven countries
Casanova, C., Celli, B. R., Barría, P., Casas, A., Côté, C., de-Torres, J. P., Jardim, J. R., Lopez, M. V., Marín, J. M., de, M. M., et al. (2010) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00194909 · Cited by 626
Metadata
- Authors
- Puhan, M. A., Mador, M. J., Held, U., Goldstein, R., Guyatt, G. H., & Schünemann, H. J.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Zurich (CH)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IT)
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2008-06-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 637-643
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2041114293
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 23.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- European Commission
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (115216, 42192, 3233B0/115216/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Keywords
- 6-minute walk distance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, minimal important difference, cut-off values, treatment effect interpretation, standardized response mean, effect size, anchor-based methods, distribution-based methods, exercise capacity
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Clinical Trials as Topic, Exercise Test, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Exercise Tolerance, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review