Cited by 256Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Effect of pulmonary exacerbations on long-term lung function decline in cystic fibrosis

Open access
Waters, Valerie, Stanojevic, Sanja, Atenafu, Eshetu G., Lu, Annie, Yau, Yvonne, Tullis, Elizabeth, Ratjen, Felix·2012·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

It is unknown what proportion of long-term lung function decline in cystic fibrosis (CF) is explained by pulmonary exacerbations. The aim of this study was to determine how exacerbations requiring hospitalisation contribute to the course of CF lung disease. This was a retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was the rate of decline of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1) % predicted. Out of 851 subjects, 415 (48.8%) subjects had ≥1 exacerbation. After adjustment for confounders, the annual rate of FEV 1 decline in those without an exacerbation was 1.2% per yr (95% CI 1.0–1.5), compared with 2.5% per yr (95% CI 2.1–2.8) in those with an exacerbation. The proportion of overall FEV 1 decline associated with ≥1 exacerbation was 52% (95% CI 35.0–68.9). For a given number of exacerbations, the annual rate of FEV 1 decline was greatest in subjects with ≤6 months between exacerbations. Half of FEV 1 decline seen in CF patients was associated with pulmonary exacerbations. Time between exacerbations, specifically ≤6 months between exacerbations, plays an important contribution to overall lung function decline. These findings support using time to next exacerbation as a clinical end-point for CF trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00159111

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waters, V., Stanojevic, S., Atenafu, E. G., Lu, A., Yau, Y., Tullis, E., & Ratjen, F.
Affiliations
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
61-66
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2143843692
Cited by
256
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, pulmonary exacerbations, lung function decline, FEV1 decline, hospitalization, clinical trial endpoints, lung disease progression
MeSH terms
Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Lung, Male, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review