The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical predictors of pulmonary hypertension in sarcoidosis
Open accessAbstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) adversely affects outcome in sarcoidosis and is an important predictor of mortality in these patients. Early and accurate diagnosis of this complication may improve outcome. The current authors hypothesised that integration of 6-min walk test (6MWT) as part of the evaluation leads to an earlier diagnosis of this complication. A total of 162 patients with sarcoidosis underwent 6MWT. Demographic and pulmonary function results were analysed. Patients were further assessed by echocardiography and right heart catheterisation when clinically indicated. Patients with sarcoidosis-associated PH had significantly decreased results on pulmonary function testing. They also walked shorter distances and desaturated to lower levels on 6MWT. On logistic regression analyses, significant predictors of PH were oxygen saturation <90% on 6MWT (odds ratio (OR) 12.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.66–19.73) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide <60% predicted (OR 7.3, 95% CI 1.98–24.82). Moreover, by combining the results of oxygen saturation at 6 min with those of echocardiography, the ability to correctly predict the presence of PH by right heart catheterisation was improved. Patients with diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide <60% predicted and oxygen desaturation <90% on 6-min walk test have a high likelihood of pulmonary hypertension and should undergo further evaluation for the presence of this disorder.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test
(2002) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 · Cited by 11,195
Cited by
Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension
Simonneau, G., Gatzoulis, M. A., Adatia, I., Celermajer, D., Denton, C., Ghofrani, A., Gomez Sanchez, M. A., Krishna Kumar, R., Landzberg, M., Machado, R. F., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.029 · Cited by 4,191
Updated Clinical Classification of Pulmonary Hypertension
Simonneau, G., Robbins, I. M., Beghetti, M., Channick, R. N., Delcroix, M., Denton, C. P., Elliott, C. G., Gaine, S. P., Gladwin, M. T., Jing, Z.-C., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.012 · Cited by 2,093
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourbonnais, J. M., & Samavati, L.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2008-04-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 296-302
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2097551954
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical predictors of pulmonary hypertension in sarcoidosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00175907
- The paper
- Bourbonnais, J. M., & Samavati, L. (2008). Clinical predictors of pulmonary hypertension in sarcoidosis. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00175907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.