Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cough augmentation with mechanical insufflation/exsufflation in patients with neuromuscular weakness

Chatwin, M., Ross, E., Hart, N., Nickol, A.H., Polkey, M.I., Simonds, A.K.·2003·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Adults and children with neuromuscular disease exhibit weak cough and are susceptible to recurrent chest infections, a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Mechanical insufflation/exsufflation may improve cough efficacy by increasing peak cough flow. It was hypothesised that mechanical insufflation/exsufflation would produce a greater increase in peak cough flow than other modes of cough augmentation. The acceptability of these interventions was also compared. Twenty-two patients aged 10–56 yrs (median 21 yrs) with neuromuscular disease and 19 age-matched controls were studied. Spirometry was performed and respiratory muscle strength measured. Peak cough flow was recorded during maximal unassisted coughs, followed in random order by coughs assisted by physiotherapy, noninvasive ventilation, insufflation and exsufflation, and exsufflation alone. Subjects rated strength of cough, distress and comfort on a visual analogue scale. In the neuromuscular disease group, mean±sd forced expiratory volume in one second was 0.8±0.6 L·s−1, forced vital capacity 0.9±0.8 L, maximum inspiratory pressure 25±16 cmH 2 O, maximum expiratory pressure 26±22 cmH 2 O and unassisted peak cough flow 169±90 L·min−1. The greatest increase in peak cough flow was observed with mechanical insufflation/exsufflation at 235±111 L·min−1(p<0.01). All techniques showed similar patient acceptability. Mechanical insufflation/exsufflation produces a greater increase in peak cough flow than other standard cough augmentation techniques in adults and children with neuromuscular disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.03.00048102

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Chatwin, M., Ross, E., Hart, N., Nickol, A. H., Polkey, M. I., & Simonds, A. K.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2003-03
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
502-508
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2170898228
Cited by
389
References
24
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cough augmentation with mechanical insufflation/exsufflation in patients with neuromuscular weakness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.03.00048102
The paper
Chatwin, M., Ross, E., Hart, N., Nickol, A. H., Polkey, M. I., & Simonds, A. K. (2003). Cough augmentation with mechanical insufflation/exsufflation in patients with neuromuscular weakness. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00048102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.