The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pulmonary hypertension in advanced sarcoidosis: epidemiology and clinical characteristics: Table. 1—
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a predictor of poor outcome in sarcoidosis. Little is known about the epidemiology of PH in sarcoidosis. The current authors reviewed the records of patients with sarcoidosis listed for lung transplantation in the USA between January 1995 and December 2002. PH was defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure of >25 mmHg and severe PH as a mean pulmonary artery pressure of ≥40 mmHg. The cohort included 363 patients of whom 73.8% had PH. Neither spirometric testing nor the need for corticosteroids was associated with PH. Subjects with PH required more supplemental oxygen (2.7±1.8 L·min−1versus 1.6±1.4 L·min−1). The cardiac index was lower in individuals with PH, whereas the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was higher. In multivariate analysis, supplemental oxygen remained an independent predictor of PH, whereas the relationship between cardiac index and PH was no longer significant. As a screening test, the need for oxygen had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.8% and 32.6%, respectively. Pulmonary hypertension is common in advanced sarcoidosis. The need for oxygen correlates with pulmonary hypertension. Since pulmonary hypertension is associated with poor outcomes and because simple clinical criteria fail to identify patients with sarcoidosis and pulmonary hypertension, more aggressive screening for this should be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension
Simonneau, G., Gatzoulis, M. A., Adatia, I., Celermajer, D., Denton, C., Ghofrani, A., Gomez Sanchez, M. A., Krishna Kumar, R., Landzberg, M., Machado, R. F., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.029 · Cited by 4,191
ACCF/AHA 2009 Expert Consensus Document on Pulmonary Hypertension
McLaughlin, V. V., Archer, S. L., Badesch, D. B., Barst, R. J., Farber, H. W., Lindner, J. R., Mathier, M. A., McGoon, M. D., Park, M. H., Rosenson, R. S., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.004 · Cited by 2,360
Updated Clinical Classification of Pulmonary Hypertension
Simonneau, G., Robbins, I. M., Beghetti, M., Channick, R. N., Delcroix, M., Denton, C. P., Elliott, C. G., Gaine, S. P., Gladwin, M. T., Jing, Z.-C., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.012 · Cited by 2,093
Orens, J. B., Estenne, M., Arcasoy, S., Conte, J. V., Corris, P., Egan, J. J., Egan, T., Keshavjee, S., Knoop, C., Kotloff, R., et al. (2006) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2006.03.011 · Cited by 1,073
Self-citationPulmonary hypertension in chronic lung disease and hypoxia
Nathan, S. D., Barbera, J. A., Gaine, S. P., Harari, S., Martinez, F. J., Olschewski, H., Olsson, K. M., Peacock, A. J., Pepke-Zaba, J., Provencher, S., et al. (2019) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.01914-2018 · Cited by 757
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shorr, A. F., Helman, D. L., Davies, D. B., & Nathan, S. D.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 783-788
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2167735678
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulmonary hypertension in advanced sarcoidosis: epidemiology and clinical characteristics: Table. 1—. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.05.00083404
- The paper
- Shorr, A. F., Helman, D. L., Davies, D. B., & Nathan, S. D. (2005). Pulmonary hypertension in advanced sarcoidosis: epidemiology and clinical characteristics: Table. 1—. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00083404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.