Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of inspiratory effort in sniff-like aspiration reflex, gasping and normal breathing in cats

Open access
Tomori, Z, Donic, V, Kurpas, M·1993·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

The changes in airway occlusion pressure and airflow, occurring during two spasmodic breathing patterns, were studied and compared with normal breathing pattern in 12 anaesthetized cats. The inspiratory effort developed during the sniff-like aspiration reflex elicited by mechanical stimulation of the nasopharynx under control conditions proved to be very similar in character and intensity to the activity observed during gasping which occurred on resuscitation, of the same cats, from hypoxic apnoea. The starting (P50) and maximum (Pmax) airway occlusion pressure developed in these two spasmodic breathing patterns were very high. Extremely rapid rates of contraction and relaxation were detected by computer-assisted measurements of dynamic changes in both the pressure values and the slopes of pressure curves. The results suggest common effector mechanisms, reflecting similar forceful inspiratory drives, for the aspiration reflex and gasping. These two spasmodic processes differ substantially from normal breathing. Nevertheless, the aspiration reflex differs from gasping in that it can be elicited by activation of upper airway afferents during eupnea. Moreover, as yet, there is no definitive evidence that the brainstem mechanisms responsible for generating the aspiration reflex are the same as those of the gasp. The main benefits of this reflex are its rather easy elicitability under various conditions and its capability to induce important cardiorespiratory effects (e.g.) reversal of central apnoea) owing to its powerful activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.93.06010053

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Tomori, Z., Donic, V, & Kurpas, M.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
1993-01-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
53-59
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W1901945304
Cited by
276
References
23
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of inspiratory effort in sniff-like aspiration reflex, gasping and normal breathing in cats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.93.06010053
The paper
Tomori, Z., Donic, V, & Kurpas, M. (1993). Comparison of inspiratory effort in sniff-like aspiration reflex, gasping and normal breathing in cats. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.93.06010053

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.