Heliox, dyspnoea and exercise in COPD
Open accessAbstract
One of the most important determinants of physical and mental well-being of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is participation in physical activity. The ability to alter the sensation of dyspnoea during exercise may improve both exercise duration and intensity. Despite the low density, inert nature, strong safety profile and multiple applications of helium gas, the potential benefit of helium–oxygen gas mixtures as an adjunct therapy to modify disease symptoms and exercise capabilities in obstructive lung diseases has only recently been explored. This is a systematic review of the available peer-reviewed evidence exploring whether symptom modification (perceived levels of dyspnoea) and exercise performance in COPD (either intensity or duration of work) are modified by inhalation of Heliox. Eight experimental studies met inclusion for this review. A variety of methodologies and outcome variables were used negating meta-analysis and hampering direct comparison between interventions. Overall, there was high level of evidence with a low risk of bias supporting Heliox's effectiveness in improving the intensity and endurance of exercise when compared to room air for people with COPD. Little conclusive evidence was found to determine whether Heliox altered the sensation of dyspnoea during exercise.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heliox supplementation improves exercise intensity and endurance in patients with COPD in comparison with room air breathing.
“Heliox supplementation has been shown to improve exercise intensity and endurance in patients with COPD in comparison with room air breathing.172”
From Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2014) · cites this paper as [172]
Effects of heliox on dyspnea are likely but less clearly documented in the current literature.
“Effects on dyspnea are likely but less clearly documented in the current literature.172”
From Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2014) · cites this paper as [172]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Hunt, T., Williams, M. T., Frith, P., & Schembri, D.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Venue
- European Respiratory Review
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2010-02-28
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 115
- Pages
- 30-38
- ISSN
- 0905-9180 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0617
- PMC
- PMC9491633
- OpenAlex
- W2170399916
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Respiratory Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- heliox, helium-oxygen mixture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dyspnea, exercise capacity, exercise endurance, symptom modification, physical activity, adjunctive therapy
- MeSH terms
- Dyspnea, Exercise Therapy, Helium, Humans, Oxygen, Respiratory Therapy, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review