Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 159 of the 159 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions

Open access
Bibby, Anna C., Dorn, Patrick, Psallidas, Ioannis, Porcel, Jose M., Janssen, Julius, Froudarakis, Marios, Subotic, Dragan, Astoul, Phillippe, Licht, Peter, Schmid, Ralph, Scherpereel, Arnaud, Rahman, Najib M., Cardillo, Giuseppe, Maskell, Nick A.·2018·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are a common pathology, treated by respiratory physicians and thoracic surgeons alike. In recent years, several well-designed randomised clinical trials have been published that have changed the landscape of MPE management. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) established a multidisciplinary collaboration of clinicians with expertise in the management of MPE with the aim of producing a comprehensive review of the scientific literature. Six areas of interest were identified, including the optimum management of symptomatic MPE, management of trapped lung in MPE, management of loculated MPE, prognostic factors in MPE, whether there is a role for oncological therapies prior to intervention for MPE and whether a histological diagnosis is always required in MPE. The literature revealed that talc pleurodesis and indwelling pleural catheters effectively manage the symptoms of MPE. There was limited evidence regarding the management of trapped lung or loculated MPE. The LENT score was identified as a validated tool for predicting survival in MPE, with Brims' prognostic score demonstrating utility in mesothelioma prognostication. There was no evidence to support the use of oncological therapies as an alternative to MPE drainage, and the literature supported the use of tissue biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/13993003.00349-2018

Cites

159 of 159 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 159 references

Cited by

See all 316

Metadata

Authors
Bibby, A. C., Dorn, P., Psallidas, I., Porcel, J. M., Janssen, J., Froudarakis, M., Subotic, D., Astoul, P., Licht, P., Schmid, R., Scherpereel, A., Rahman, N. M., Cardillo, G., & Maskell, N. A.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2018-07
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
1800349
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2884284882
Cited by
316
References
159
FWCI
19.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/13993003.00349-2018
The paper
Bibby, A. C., Dorn, P., Psallidas, I., Porcel, J. M., Janssen, J., Froudarakis, M., Subotic, D., Astoul, P., Licht, P., Schmid, R., Scherpereel, A., Rahman, N. M., Cardillo, G., & Maskell, N. A. (2018). ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00349-2018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.