Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A standardised method for interpreting the association between mutations and phenotypic drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Open access
Miotto, Paolo, Tessema, Belay, Tagliani, Elisa, Chindelevitch, Leonid, Starks, Angela M., Emerson, Claudia, Hanna, Debra, Kim, Peter S., Liwski, Richard, Zignol, Matteo, Gilpin, Christopher, Niemann, Stefan, Denkinger, Claudia M., Fleming, Joy, Warren, Robin M., Crook, Derrick, Posey, James, Gagneux, Sebastien, Hoffner, Sven, Rodrigues, Camilla, Comas, Iñaki, Engelthaler, David M., Murray, Megan, Alland, David, Rigouts, Leen, Lange, Christoph, Dheda, Keertan, Hasan, Rumina, Ranganathan, Uma Devi K., McNerney, Ruth, Ezewudo, Matthew, Cirillo, Daniela M., Schito, Marco, Köser, Claudio U., Rodwell, Timothy C.·2017·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

A clear understanding of the genetic basis of antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is required to accelerate the development of rapid drug susceptibility testing methods based on genetic sequence. Raw genotype–phenotype correlation data were extracted as part of a comprehensive systematic review to develop a standardised analytical approach for interpreting resistance associated mutations for rifampicin, isoniazid, ofloxacin/levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, amikacin, kanamycin, capreomycin, streptomycin, ethionamide/prothionamide and pyrazinamide. Mutation frequencies in resistant and susceptible isolates were calculated, together with novel statistical measures to classify mutations as high, moderate, minimal or indeterminate confidence for predicting resistance. We identified 286 confidence-graded mutations associated with resistance. Compared to phenotypic methods, sensitivity (95% CI) for rifampicin was 90.3% (89.6–90.9%), while for isoniazid it was 78.2% (77.4–79.0%) and their specificities were 96.3% (95.7–96.8%) and 94.4% (93.1–95.5%), respectively. For second-line drugs, sensitivity varied from 67.4% (64.1–70.6%) for capreomycin to 88.2% (85.1–90.9%) for moxifloxacin, with specificity ranging from 90.0% (87.1–92.5%) for moxifloxacin to 99.5% (99.0–99.8%) for amikacin. This study provides a standardised and comprehensive approach for the interpretation of mutations as predictors of M. tuberculosis drug-resistant phenotypes. These data have implications for the clinical interpretation of molecular diagnostics and next-generation sequencing as well as efficient individualised therapy for patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/13993003.01354-2017

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Miotto, P., Tessema, B., Tagliani, E., Chindelevitch, L., Starks, A. M., Emerson, C., Hanna, D., Kim, P. S., Liwski, R., Zignol, M., Gilpin, C., Niemann, S., Denkinger, C. M., Fleming, J., Warren, R. M., Crook, D., Posey, J., Gagneux, S., Hoffner, S., Rodrigues, C., Comas, I., Engelthaler, D. M., Murray, M., Alland, D., Rigouts, L., Lange, C., Dheda, K., Hasan, R., Ranganathan, U. D. K., McNerney, R., Ezewudo, M., Cirillo, D. M., Schito, M., Köser, C. U., & Rodwell, T. C.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2017-12
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
1701354
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2779510789
Cited by
327
References
3
FWCI
28.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A standardised method for interpreting the association between mutations and phenotypic drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/13993003.01354-2017
The paper
Miotto, P., Tessema, B., Tagliani, E., Chindelevitch, L., Starks, A. M., Emerson, C., Hanna, D., Kim, P. S., Liwski, R., Zignol, M., Gilpin, C., Niemann, S., Denkinger, C. M., Fleming, J., Warren, R. M., Crook, D., Posey, J., Gagneux, S., Hoffner, S., . . . Rodwell, T. C. (2017). A standardised method for interpreting the association between mutations and phenotypic drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01354-2017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.