Cited by 9Sphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

BMS-986278, a lysophosphatidic acid 1 (LPA1) receptor antagonist, in healthy participants: A single/multiple ascending dose (SAD/MAD) phase 1 study

Abstract

Introduction: The LPA1 receptor is implicated in IPF pathogenesis. BMS-986278 is a potent small molecule LPA1 receptor antagonist being investigated for IPF. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and PK of oral BMS-986278 in healthy participants (ppts). Methods: IM027-009 is a phase 1, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, randomized study in healthy adults. In SAD evaluation (with sentinel dosing), ppts received BMS-986278 or PBO (6:2) at doses 3, 10, 30, 100, 150, or 250mg; food and pH effects were analyzed with 100mg. The 250-mg SAD was terminated due to dose-limiting AEs (sentinel cohort). In MAD evaluation, ppts received BMS-986278 or PBO (6:2) for 14d at doses QD (10 or 30mg) or BID (30, 60, or 125mg). Results: SAD: 37 ppts received BMS-986278 and 11 received PBO; MAD: 30 ppts received BMS-986278 and 10 received PBO. Baseline demographics were similar between BMS-986278 and PBO groups in SAD and MAD. Most AEs were mild; the most common AE was headache. Decreases in blood pressure were seen in SAD and MAD cohorts and were not associated with discontinuation. No clinically significant elevations in liver function tests were seen. In both SAD and MAD cohorts, BMS 986278 Cmax and AUC appeared dose proportional with a half-life of approximately 10h; Tmax was slower after a high-fat meal vs fasted state with no exposure difference. Gastric pH had no notable effect on BMS-986278 PK. Conclusions: BMS-986278 was generally well tolerated; blood pressure reductions were…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1398

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some healthy volunteers who received placebo or admilparant in a phase 1 study had reversible and generally asymptomatic blood pressure reductions.

    “As a phase 1 study showed that some healthy volunteers who received placebo or admilparant had reversible and generally asymptomatic blood pressure reductions (16), this study included monitoring for blood pressure changes and for orthostatic signs and symptoms per standard guidelines (17).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tirucherai, G., Yu, D., Revankar, R., Klinger, G., Van Lier, J. J., Taubel, J., & Correll, T.
Affiliations
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
  • PRA Health Sciences (US)
Venue
Rare ILD/DPLD
Published
2019-09-28
Pages
PA1398
OpenAlex
W2990445664
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
lysophosphatidic acid, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, dose proportionality, food effect, blood pressure reduction, healthy volunteers, multiple ascending dose, single ascending dose, dose-limiting adverse events, liver function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review