Cited by 1

Early use of oral moist tobacco as related to respiratory symptoms: a cross-sectional analysis from the RHINESSA study

López-Cervantes, Juan Pablo, Janson, Christer, Accordini, Simone, Schlünssen, Vivi, J. Bertelsen, Randi, Svanes, Cecilie·2023·Tobacco, smoking control and health education

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests an association of oral moist tobacco (snus) with higher risk of asthma, asthma-symptoms, and chronic bronchitis among never smokers. However, there is no knowledge of whether time at snus initiation plays a role for respiratory outcomes. Objective: To investigate associations of snus use starting in puberty (≤15 years of age) and after, with asthma and asthma-like symptoms. Methods: Questionnaire data on tobacco habits and respiratory outcomes were obtained in Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, and Estonia from 9002 responders [median age 29 years (15-72); 58% females] from the Respiratory Health In Northern Europe, Spain and Australia (RHINESSA) study in 2013-16. Time at snus initiation was classified as never (reference), ≤15, or >15 years of age. Multilevel logistic regression models adjusted for age and smoking, and stratified by sex were used to analyze associations of time at snus initiation and 1) asthma-like symptoms (≥3 vs. <3), and 2) asthma medication use and/or asthma attacks in the last 12 months (yes vs. no). Results: Snus use was reported by 20.4% of the participants of whom 21.7% had started in puberty. Women using snus in puberty had a higher OR for asthma-like symptoms (OR 2.54; 95%CI 1.37-4.70) and for asthma medication/attacks (OR 1.70; 95%CI 0.87-3.31) compared to never users. No significant effect could be identified for early onset snus use in males (OR 1.15; 95%CI 0.74-1.79) or late initiation in either of the sexes. Conclu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa3335

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women who used snus in puberty compared to never-users have higher odds for asthma-like symptoms (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: 1.37-4.70) and for asthma attacks and medication intake (OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 0.87-3.31); there is no significant effect for snus initiation in puberty by males or late initiation in either sex.

    “women who were using snus in puberty compared to never-users had higher odds for asthma-like symptoms (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: 1.37-4.70)and for asthma attacks and medication intake (OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 0.87-3.31).Moreover, there was no significant effect for snus initiation in puberty by males (OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.74-1.79)or late initiation in either of the sexes (López-Cervantes et al. 2023).”

Authors
López-Cervantes, J. P., Janson, C., Accordini, S., Schlünssen, V., J. Bertelsen, R., & Svanes, C.
Venue
Tobacco, smoking control and health education
Published
2023-09-09
Pages
PA3335
Cited by
1
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review