Social Media Analytics for Stance Mining A Multi-Modal Approach with Weak Supervision
Open accessAbstract
People express their opinions on blogs and other social media platforms. As per a recent estimate, interactions on Twitter alone result in over 500 million tweets perday. The magnitude of this data enables new applications of opinion mining that have previously remained challenging e.g., finding users’ stance (as in pro or con) on topics of interest. However, one of the major barriers to utilizing this amount of data is the cost of hand-labeling examples for machine learning. This barrier is even more apparent in stance mining, as opinions can change overtime and can be about any issues. To reduce the need for hand-labeled data by taking the complex interactions of social media users and their social influence into account, this dissertationdevelops semi-supervised methods for stance mining.Most existing studies on stance mining take a simplistic view that assumes a sentence (like a Tweet) holds a perspective that is independent of the context and the author’s network position. This approach to stance learning leaves three crucial unresolved challenges. First, how do we train stance-learning models on new topics with minimal labeling effort? Discussion topics change fast and new issues emerge, making it difficult to reuse prior labeled data. However, artifacts of social networks like hashtags can give noisy signal about the stance of users. To extract the signal from noise, I develop methods to find useful hashtags by exploiting how users in the pro-group and the anti-group u…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intergroup exposures in online communication trigger further incivility and toxicity.
“Instead, research finds that these intergroup exposures trigger further incivility and toxicity [20].”
From Affective Polarization in Online Climate Change Discourse on Twitter (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 11
- Authors
- Kumar, S.
- Corresponding author
- Sumeet Kumar
- ORCID
- Sumeet Kumar
- Venue
- Carnegie Mellon University
- Publisher
- Carnegie Mellon University
- Published
- 2020
- OpenAlex
- W6922113251
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Digital Eprints Services at ISB (DESI) (Indian School of Business) (acceptedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- KiltHub Repository
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- sentiment analysis, weakly supervised learning, semi-supervised learning, hashtags, social influence, network alignment, co-training, retweets and likes, Twitter, controversial issues, stance prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review