The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Information distribution aspects of design methodology
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules
Parnas, D. L. (1972) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/361598.361623 · Cited by 4,704
Self-citationReadings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence
(1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07700-6 · Cited by 986
Programming with abstract data types
Liskov, B., & Zilles, S. (1974) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Very high level languages - · doi:10.1145/800233.807045 · Cited by 734
A technique for software module specification with examples
Parnas, D. L. (1972) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/355602.361309 · Cited by 726
Self-citationSalvador, F., Forza, C., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2002) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00027-x · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Parnas, D. L.
- Venue
- KiltHub Repository
- Publisher
- Carnegie Mellon University
- Published
- 2018-06-30
- Pages
- 339-344
- OpenAlex
- W6884751169
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information distribution aspects of design methodology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1184/r1/6606470
- The paper
- Parnas, D. L. (2018). Information distribution aspects of design methodology. KiltHub Repository. https://doi.org/10.1184/r1/6606470
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
