The multinational Men's Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study: I. Prevalence oSf erectile dysfunction and related health concerns in the general population
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aims of the Men's Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study were to identify prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) and related health issues in the general male population in Europe, North and South America, and to examine the attitudes and behavior of men in relation to these health issues. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Phase I of the MALES study involved 27839 men aged 20-75 years who were interviewed in eight countries (United States, United Kingdom, Germany,France, Italy, Spain, Mexico, and Brazil) using a standardized questionnaire. Phase II of the MALES study involved 2912 men who were recruited from the sub-sample of Phase I MALES participants who reported ED together with additional men with ED recruited from other sources. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prevalence of ED and associated attitudes. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ED in the MALES sample was 16%. ED prevalence varied markedly by country, however, from a high of 22%of men in the US reporting ED to a low of 10% in Spain. The prevalence of self-reported ED increased with increasing age. Men with co-morbid medical conditions and risk factors, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia,and depression all reported higher prevalence of ED. Men with ED also reported increased prevalence rates of these co-morbid conditions. MALES Phase II data indicated that among men who reported ED, 58% had actively sought medical attention for their condition; however, only 16% of men with ED were currently being treated with oral PDE-5 therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The MALES study confirms the high prevalence rates of ED and its association with co-morbid medical conditions, such as diabetes and depression, reported in other large-scale, epidemiological studies. Despite the advent of oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors, only 58% of ED sufferers consult a physician about their problem, and only 16% of men with self-reported ED maintain their use of oral therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Rosen et al's second worldwide study, the overall prevalence rate of erectile dysfunction was 16% and individual rates from the seven countries except the United States were below this rate, with the overall prevalence rate of erectile dysfunction in the United States being 22%.
“The overall prevalence rate was 16% and the individual rates from the seven countries except the United States were below this rate, with the overall prevalence rate of ED in the United States being 22%.”
From Incidence and Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction in Women and Men: A Consensus Statement from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine 2015 (2016) · cites this paper as [43]
In Rosen et al's second worldwide study, prevalence rates for erectile dysfunction were in the teens for the three decades beginning with 20 through 49 years of age.
“Rates were in the teens for the three decades beginning with 20 through 49 years of age.”
From Incidence and Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction in Women and Men: A Consensus Statement from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine 2015 (2016) · cites this paper as [43]
In Rosen et al's second worldwide study, for the next two decades beginning at 50 to 69 years, prevalence rates of 22% and 30% were reported, with a prevalence rate of 37% for the 6 years of 70 to 75.
“For the next two decades, beginning at 50 to 69 years, prevalence rates of 22% and 30% were reported, with a prevalence rate of 37% for the 6 years of 70 to 75.”
From Incidence and Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction in Women and Men: A Consensus Statement from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine 2015 (2016) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 588
- Authors
- Rosen, R. C., Fisher, W. A., Eardley, I., Niederberger, C., Nadel, A., & Sand, M.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rosen, Raymond C.
- Venue
- Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Publisher
- Informa Healthcare
- Published
- 2004-03-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 607-617
- ISSN
- 0300-7995 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-4877
- OpenAlex
- W1999059326
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 23.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Medical Research and Opinion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bayer Corporation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Keywords
- erectile dysfunction, prevalence, men's health, comorbidities, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, depression, diabetes mellitus, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, treatment seeking, physician consultation, sexual attitudes, age-related prevalence, cross-national comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Attitude to Health, Europe, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, North America, Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, South America, Comorbidity, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review