BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate): a review of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease, affecting more than 2.5 million people worldwide with more 400,000 cases in the United States alone. There has been considerable improvement in the treatment of MS, with the introduction of disease-modifying drugs; however, new oral therapies may provide additional benefit by providing an alternative treatment modality and the potential for improved adherence by avoiding the injection-associated side effects and anxiety encountered with some first-line agents. BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) is an oral agent approved in the United States for the treatment of relapsing forms of MS. SCOPE: We review published literature about what is known about the mechanism of action of BG-12, and key efficacy and safety findings from three clinical studies in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). FINDINGS: Data from preclinical studies have demonstrated that BG-12 may promote anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective activities that are mediated, at least in part, by the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) antioxidant response pathway. Studies in animals have shown a protective effect of BG-12 on neuronal, axonal and myelin integrity. Results from a phase 2 study and two randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 studies, CONFIRM and DEFINE, have shown that BG-12 provides clinical and radiologic efficacy in patients with RRMS. At 2 years, BG-12 240 mg twice and three times daily reduced annualized relapse rate (CONFIRM primary endpoint) by 44% and 51% and the risk of relapse (DEFINE primary endpoint) by 49% and 50%, respectively, compared with placebo (all p < 0.001). BG-12 was generally well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile, with a similar incidence of adverse events across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: BG-12 may have cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory properties that contribute to its efficacy among patients with RRMS. Findings from phase 2 and 3 studies further support BG-12 as an effective initial therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00168701; NCT00420212: NCT00451451.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mutations in the ligand binding and pore regions are predicted to be more fundamentally disruptive.
“Mutations in the ligand binding and pore regions are predicted to be more fundamentally disruptive”
From Linking early-life NMDAR hypofunction and oxidative stress in schizophrenia pathogenesis (2016) · cites this paper as [109]
Mutations in the ligand binding and pore regions tend to be more associated with childhood-onset intellectual disability and global delay (and often epilepsy).
“tend to be more associated with childhood-onset intellectual disability and global delay (and often with epilepsy)”
From Linking early-life NMDAR hypofunction and oxidative stress in schizophrenia pathogenesis (2016) · cites this paper as [109]
Schizophrenia-associated mutations tend to be located at the N- and C-termini, away from the ligand binding and pore-forming regions.
“It is important to note that schizophrenia-associated mutations tend to be located at the N-and C-termini, away from the ligand binding and pore-forming regions.”
From Linking early-life NMDAR hypofunction and oxidative stress in schizophrenia pathogenesis (2016) · cites this paper as [109]
Nonsense or frameshift mutations in any domain are also associated with childhood-onset intellectual disability and global delay (and often epilepsy).
“as are nonsense or frameshift mutations in any domain 109”
From Linking early-life NMDAR hypofunction and oxidative stress in schizophrenia pathogenesis (2016) · cites this paper as [109]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Fox, R. J., Kita, M., Cohan, S. L., Henson, L. J., Zambrano, J., Scannevin, R. H., O'Gorman, J., Novas, M., Dawson, K. T., & Phillips, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Virginia Mason Medical Center (US)
- Providence Portland Medical Center (US)
- International Neuroscience Institute (DE)
- Biogen (United States) (US)
- Multiple Sclerosis Program, Baylor Institute for Immunology Research Dallas, TXUSA
- Corresponding author
- Fox, Robert J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-10-22
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-262
- ISSN
- 0300-7995 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-4877
- OpenAlex
- W2167170024
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Medical Research and Opinion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Biogen
- IC Design Education Center
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Keywords
- BG-12, dimethyl fumarate, multiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, cytoprotection, anti-inflammatory activity, disease-modifying therapy, oral therapy, relapse rate, drug safety, mechanism of action
- MeSH terms
- Dimethyl Fumarate, Adult, Animals, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fumarates, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, NF-E2-Related Factor 2, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review