The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics
Open accessAbstract
During the last ten years, the use of molecular markers, revealing polymorphism at the DNA level, has been playing an increasing part in animal genetics studies. Amongst others, the microsatellite DNA marker has been the most widely used, due to its easy use by simple PCR, followed by a denaturing gel electrophoresis for allele size determination, and to the high degree of information provided by its large number of alleles per locus. Despite this, a new marker type, named SNP, for Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, is now on the scene and has gained high popularity, even though it is only a bi-allelic type of marker. In this review, we will discuss the reasons for this apparent step backwards, and the pertinence of the use of SNPs in animal genetics, in comparison with other marker types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes
Johnson, G. C. L., Esposito, L., Barratt, B. J., Smith, A. N., Heward, J., Di Genova, G., Ueda, H., Cordell, H. J., Eaves, I. A., Dudbridge, F., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1001-233 · Cited by 1,174
Blocks of Limited Haplotype Diversity Revealed by High-Resolution Scanning of Human Chromosome 21
Patil, N., Berno, A. J., Hinds, D. A., Barrett, W. A., Doshi, J. M., Hacker, C. R., Kautzer, C. R., Lee, D. H., Marjoribanks, C., McDonough, D. P., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065573 · Cited by 1,145
Cited by
SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation
Morin, P. A., Luikart, G., Wayne, R. K., & the SNP workshop group (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.009 · Cited by 1,080
Determining the Polymorphism Information Content of a molecular marker
Serrote, C. M. L., Reiniger, L. R. S., Silva, K. B., Rabaiolli, S. M. D. S., & Stefanel, C. M. (2020) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2019.144175 · Cited by 336
SNP Discovery through Next-Generation Sequencing and Its Applications
Kumar, S., Banks, T. W., & Cloutier, S. (2012) · International Journal of Plant Genomics · doi:10.1155/2012/831460 · Cited by 309
On the Origin of Cattle: How Aurochs Became Cattle and Colonized the World
Ajmone‐Marsan, P., Garcia, J. F., & Lenstra, J. A. (2010) · Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20267 · Cited by 287
Extensive loss of cell-cycle and DNA repair genes in an ancient lineage of bipolar budding yeasts
Steenwyk, J. L., Opulente, D. A., Kominek, J., Shen, X.-X., Zhou, X., Labella, A. L., Bradley, N. P., Eichman, B. F., Čadež, N., Libkind, D., et al. (2019) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000255 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Vignal, A., Milan, D., SanCristobal, M., & Eggen, A.
- Venue
- Genetics Selection Evolution
- Published
- 2002-05-15
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-305
- ISSN
- 0999-193X (ISSN-L)
- 1297-9686
- OpenAlex
- W2103850807
- Cited by
- 1,040
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1297-9686-34-3-275
- The paper
- Vignal, A., Milan, D., SanCristobal, M., & Eggen, A. (2002). A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genetics Selection Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-34-3-275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
