The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motif Enrichment Analysis: a unified framework and an evaluation on ChIP data
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A major goal of molecular biology is determining the mechanisms that control the transcription of genes. Motif Enrichment Analysis (MEA) seeks to determine which DNA-binding transcription factors control the transcription of a set of genes by detecting enrichment of known binding motifs in the genes' regulatory regions. Typically, the biologist specifies a set of genes believed to be co-regulated and a library of known DNA-binding models for transcription factors, and MEA determines which (if any) of the factors may be direct regulators of the genes. Since the number of factors with known DNA-binding models is rapidly increasing as a result of high-throughput technologies, MEA is becoming increasingly useful. In this paper, we explore ways to make MEA applicable in more settings, and evaluate the efficacy of a number of MEA approaches. RESULTS: We first define a mathematical framework for Motif Enrichment Analysis that relaxes the requirement that the biologist input a selected set of genes. Instead, the input consists of all regulatory regions, each labeled with the level of a biological signal. We then define and implement a number of motif enrichment analysis methods. Some of these methods require a user-specified signal threshold, some identify an optimum threshold in a data-driven way and two of our methods are threshold-free. We evaluate these methods, along with two existing methods (Clover and PASTAA), using yeast ChIP-chip data. Our novel threshold-free method based on linear regression performs best in our evaluation, followed by the data-driven PASTAA algorithm. The Clover algorithm performs as well as PASTAA if the user-specified threshold is chosen optimally. Data-driven methods based on three statistical tests-Fisher Exact Test, rank-sum test, and multi-hypergeometric test--perform poorly, even when the threshold is chosen optimally. These methods (and Clover) perform even worse when unrestricted data-driven threshold determination is used. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel, threshold-free linear regression method works well on ChIP-chip data. Methods using data-driven threshold determination can perform poorly unless the range of thresholds is limited a priori. The limits implemented in PASTAA, however, appear to be well-chosen. Our novel algorithms--AME (Analysis of Motif Enrichment)-are available at http://bioinformatics.org.au/ame/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discovering motifs in ranked lists of DNA sequences
Eden, E., Lipson, D., Yogev, S., & Yakhini, Z. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030039 · Cited by 696
Zambelli, F., Pesole, G., & Pavesi, G. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp464 · Cited by 402
Cited by
iRegulon: From a Gene List to a Gene Regulatory Network Using Large Motif and Track Collections
Janky, R., Verfaillie, A., Imrichová, H., Van de Sande, B., Standaert, L., Christiaens, V., Hulselmans, G., Herten, K., Naval Sanchez, M., Potier, D., et al. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003731 · Cited by 900
Comparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse
Bakken, T. E., Jorstad, N. L., Hu, Q., Lake, B. B., Tian, W., Kalmbach, B. E., Crow, M., Hodge, R. D., Krienen, F. M., Sorensen, S. A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03465-8 · Cited by 812
A Genome-wide Framework for Mapping Gene Regulation via Cellular Genetic Screens
Gasperini, M., Hill, A. J., McFaline-Figueroa, J. L., Martin, B., Kim, S., Zhang, M. D., Jackson, D., Leith, A., Schreiber, J., Noble, W. S., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.029 · Cited by 613
A multimodal cell census and atlas of the mammalian primary motor cortex
BRAIN Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN), BRAIN Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN) Corresponding authors, Callaway, E. M., Dong, H.-W., Ecker, J. R., Hawrylycz, M. J., Huang, Z. J., Lein, E. S., Ngai, J., Osten, P., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03950-0 · Cited by 522
Identification of context-dependent expression quantitative trait loci in whole blood
Zhernakova, D. V., Deelen, P., Vermaat, M., van Iterson, M., van Galen, M., Arindrarto, W., van 't Hof, P., Mei, H., van Dijk, F., Westra, H.-J., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3737 · Cited by 416
Metadata
- Authors
- McLeay, R. C., & Bailey, T. L.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2010-04-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-165
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156661861
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motif Enrichment Analysis: a unified framework and an evaluation on ChIP data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-11-165
- The paper
- McLeay, R. C., & Bailey, T. L. (2010). Motif Enrichment Analysis: a unified framework and an evaluation on ChIP data. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.