The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TagCleaner: Identification and removal of tag sequences from genomic and metagenomic datasets
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Sequencing metagenomes that were pre-amplified with primer-based methods requires the removal of the additional tag sequences from the datasets. The sequenced reads can contain deletions or insertions due to sequencing limitations, and the primer sequence may contain ambiguous bases. Furthermore, the tag sequence may be unavailable or incorrectly reported. Because of the potential for downstream inaccuracies introduced by unwanted sequence contaminations, it is important to use reliable tools for pre-processing sequence data. RESULTS: TagCleaner is a web application developed to automatically identify and remove known or unknown tag sequences allowing insertions and deletions in the dataset. TagCleaner is designed to filter the trimmed reads for duplicates, short reads, and reads with high rates of ambiguous sequences. An additional screening for and splitting of fragment-to-fragment concatenations that gave rise to artificial concatenated sequences can increase the quality of the dataset. Users may modify the different filter parameters according to their own preferences. CONCLUSIONS: TagCleaner is a publicly available web application that is able to automatically detect and efficiently remove tag sequences from metagenomic datasets. It is easily configurable and provides a user-friendly interface. The interactive web interface facilitates export functionality for subsequent data processing, and is available at http://edwards.sdsu.edu/tagcleaner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional metagenomic profiling of nine biomes
Dinsdale, E. A., Edwards, R. A., Hall, D., Angly, F., Breitbart, M., Brulc, J. M., Furlan, M., Desnues, C., Haynes, M., Li, L., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06810 · Cited by 980
Self-citation
Cited by
Yoshida, N., Emoto, T., Yamashita, T., Watanabe, H., Hayashi, T., Tabata, T., Hoshi, N., Hatano, N., Ozawa, G., Sasaki, N., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.118.033714 · Cited by 619
Piñol, J., Mir, G., Gomez‐Polo, P., & Agustí, N. (2015) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12355 · Cited by 423
Highly replicated evolution of parapatric ecotypes
James, M. E., Arenas-Castro, H., Groh, J. S., Allen, S. L., Engelstädter, J., & Ortiz-Barrientos, D. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab207 · Cited by 30
Graf, M., Choiselat, E., Reay, M. K., Bargiela, R., Dimitriou, A., Liu, Q., Elias, R. M., Golyshin, P. N., Griffiths, R., Chadwick, D. R., et al. (2025) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139871 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmieder, R., Lim, Y. W., Rohwer, F., & Edwards, R.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2010-06-23
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 341-341
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974860827
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TagCleaner: Identification and removal of tag sequences from genomic and metagenomic datasets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-11-341
- The paper
- Schmieder, R., Lim, Y. W., Rohwer, F., & Edwards, R. (2010). TagCleaner: Identification and removal of tag sequences from genomic and metagenomic datasets. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.