NPEBseq: nonparametric empirical bayesian-based procedure for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: RNA-seq, a massive parallel-sequencing-based transcriptome profiling method, provides digital data in the form of aligned sequence read counts. The comparative analyses of the data require appropriate statistical methods to estimate the differential expression of transcript variants across different cell/tissue types and disease conditions. RESULTS: We developed a novel nonparametric empirical Bayesian-based approach (NPEBseq) to model the RNA-seq data. The prior distribution of the Bayesian model is empirically estimated from the data without any parametric assumption, and hence the method is "nonparametric" in nature. Based on this model, we proposed a method for detecting differentially expressed genes across different conditions. We also extended this method to detect differential usage of exons from RNA-seq data. The evaluation of NPEBseq on both simulated and publicly available RNA-seq datasets and comparison with three popular methods showed improved results for experiments with or without biological replicates. CONCLUSIONS: NPEBseq can successfully detect differential expression between different conditions not only at gene level but also at exon level from RNA-seq datasets. In addition, NPEBSeq performs significantly better than current methods and can be applied to genome-wide RNA-seq datasets. Sample datasets and R package are available at http://bioinformatics.wistar.upenn.edu/NPEBseq.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NOISeq and NOISeqBIO avoid false positives more efficiently at some cost to sensitivity and perform well with different numbers of replicates.
“NOISeq and NOISeqBIO (the adaptation of NOISeq for biological replication) are more efficient in avoiding false positive calls at the cost of some sensitivity but perform well with different numbers of replicates [10, 20, 212].”
From A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [212]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Bi, Y., & Davuluri, R. V.
- Affiliations
- The Wistar Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davuluri, Ramana V
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2013-08-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 262-262
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3765716
- OpenAlex
- W2070228064
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (CA010815)
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA010815)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM011297)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Keywords
- differential gene expression, RNA-seq, differential exon usage, gene expression analysis, biological replicates, gene expression profiling
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, RNA, Software, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Statistics, Nonparametric, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review