Cited by 30Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchGene expression and cancer classificationEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Integration of gene expression and DNA-methylation profiles improves molecular subtype classification in acute myeloid leukemia

Open access
Taskesen, Erdogan, Babaei, Sepideh, Reinders, Marcel MJ, de Ridder, Jeroen·2015·BMC Bioinformatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is characterized by various cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities. Detection of these abnormalities is important in the risk-classification of patients but requires laborious experimentation. Various studies showed that gene expression profiles (GEP), and the gene signatures derived from GEP, can be used for the prediction of subtypes in AML. Similarly, successful prediction was also achieved by exploiting DNA-methylation profiles (DMP). There are, however, no studies that compared classification accuracy and performance between GEP and DMP, neither are there studies that integrated both types of data to determine whether predictive power can be improved. APPROACH: Here, we used 344 well-characterized AML samples for which both gene expression and DNA-methylation profiles are available. We created three different classification strategies including early, late and no integration of these datasets and used them to predict AML subtypes using a logistic regression model with Lasso regularization. RESULTS: We illustrate that both gene expression and DNA-methylation profiles contain distinct patterns that contribute to discriminating AML subtypes and that an integration strategy can exploit these patterns to achieve synergy between both data types. We show that concatenation of features from both data sets, i.e. early integration, improves the predictive power compared to classifiers trained on GEP or DMP alone. A more sophisticated strategy, i.e. the late integration strategy, employs a two-layer classifier which outperforms the early integration strategy. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that prediction of known cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in AML can be further improved by integrating GEP and DMP profiles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2105-16-s4-s5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LASSO methods have been used for integrating gene expression and DNA methylation by Taskesen and Lee for acute myeloid leukaemia and breast cancer respectively.

    “LASSO methods have been used for this particular integration by Taskesen (Taskesen et al., 2015) and Lee (Lee et al., 2017) for acute myeloid leukaemia and breast cancer respectively.”

    From Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Taskesen et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 30

Authors
Taskesen, E., Babaei, S., Reinders, M. M., & de Ridder, J.
Affiliations
Netherlands Bioinformatics Centre (NL)
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2015-02-23
Volume
16
Issue
S4
Pages
S5-S5
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170612417
Cited by
30
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
acute myeloid leukemia, molecular subtyping, gene expression profiles, DNA methylation patterns, multi-omics integration, early integration, LASSO logistic regression, chromosomal abnormalities, risk stratification
MeSH terms
Adult, DNA, Neoplasm, Humans, Karyotyping, Neoplasm Staging, Biomarkers, Tumor, Signal Transduction, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, DNA Methylation, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review