The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phospho.ELM: A database of experimentally verified phosphorylation sites in eukaryotic proteins
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Post-translational phosphorylation is one of the most common protein modifications. Phosphoserine, threonine and tyrosine residues play critical roles in the regulation of many cellular processes. The fast growing number of research reports on protein phosphorylation points to a general need for an accurate database dedicated to phosphorylation to provide easily retrievable information on phosphoproteins. DESCRIPTION: Phospho.ELM http://phospho.elm.eu.org is a new resource containing experimentally verified phosphorylation sites manually curated from the literature and is developed as part of the ELM (Eukaryotic Linear Motif) resource. Phospho.ELM constitutes the largest searchable collection of phosphorylation sites available to the research community. The Phospho.ELM entries store information about substrate proteins with the exact positions of residues known to be phosphorylated by cellular kinases. Additional annotation includes literature references, subcellular compartment, tissue distribution, and information about the signaling pathways involved as well as links to the molecular interaction database MINT. Phospho.ELM version 2.0 contains 1703 phosphorylation site instances for 556 phosphorylated proteins. CONCLUSION: Phospho.ELM will be a valuable tool both for molecular biologists working on protein phosphorylation sites and for bioinformaticians developing computational predictions on the specificity of phosphorylation reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool
Chen, E. Y., Tan, C. M., Kou, Y., Duan, Q., Wang, Z., Meirelles, G. V., Clark, N. R., & Ma’ayan, A. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-128 · Cited by 7,814
Co-evolution of transcriptional and post-translational cell-cycle regulation
Jensen, L. J., Jensen, T. S., de Lichtenberg, U., Brunak, S., & Bork, P. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05186 · Cited by 184
Mohammed, F., Cobbold, M., Zarling, A. L., Salim, M., Barrett-Wilt, G. A., Shabanowitz, J., Hunt, D. F., Engelhard, V. H., & Willcox, B. E. (2008) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.1660 · Cited by 155
Bahl, S., & Seto, E. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-020-03599-4 · Cited by 82
PTMScout, a Web Resource for Analysis of High Throughput Post-translational Proteomics Studies
Naegle, K. M., Gymrek, M., Joughin, B. A., Wagner, J. P., Welsch, R. E., Yaffe, M. B., Lauffenburger, D. A., & White, F. M. (2010) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m110.001206 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Diella, F., Cameron, S., Gemünd, C., Linding, R., Via, A., Kuster, B., Sicheritz-Pontén, T., Blom, N., & Gibson, T. J.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2004-06-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-79
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166884712
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.